with that challenge and a second. charles, i want to get your take on trump s bond. the amount and how expeditiously they arrived at this number. donald trump is not stepping firmly into the world of what it means to be a criminal defendant at the end of a legal charge. what i mean by that is by all intense and purposes, fani willis voices position of donald trump with this indictment is as being the ringleader of everything that went on. he has the most culpability, liability, multiple accounts in the indictment, and his position at the head of every thing that occurred. because of that, she is going to seek the highest amount a bell for him, not only because of his liability and culpability and pushing them there, but also to send a message that he will be treated with the same way that anyone who is the head of an organized crime organization would be treated in terms of setting a bond that is higher than anyone else, therefore their participation or involvement will be respecte
thing that occurred. because of the, she is going to seek the highest amount a bell for him, not only because of his liability and culpability and pushing them there, but also to send a message that he will be treated with the same way that anyone has the head of an organized crime organization would be treated in terms of setting a bond that is higher than anyone else, therefore their participation or involvement will be respected different charges. that is what is going on. sometimes at the judge and how quickly the agreement was reached, i thought it was the vulnerable or surprising if you look at the history of how people prosecute those cases. it s very clear that they are moving ahead. she has to set this before having the arraignment and going forward. that is what is happening here. when you talk about timeline, that means every moment counts. katie, trump echoed warnings about his public statements of the judge in the doj election case. experts say it will be hard to stop tr
more breads to charge predicate crimes, so different crimes, the criminal in another them self but charged together as part of this enterprise, forwarding of this enterprise. so the concept of an enterprise, because we think about of it we think about most violent crimes in a business reporter, business enterprises that we re making money. does the jury have to understand that? do they have to see the effort to overturn the election as a group of people trying to do it, or is that not relevant? the enterprise can be very loosely formed. it s essentially an association of individuals. the people charged can be members of that into prize or frankly merely associates of that enterprise, but it is a very loose term and it s easy to fend to groups, whether a violent gang or more formal organized crime organization
and the meeting with the people and meeting with his entourage. with the police and all of that. so it shows that he is not a strong command in leadership. he is just a strongman as a this statement. and he is a dictator. but he is, you know, caught up. he is trying to hide everything now with iraq. but you know what, of course they knew a lot. because that is the organized crime organization, the russian leadership, the russian government, putin s regime is just a mafia, and in the mafia
this statement. and he is a dictator. but he is, you know, caught up. he is trying to hide everything now with iraq. but you know what, of course they knew a lot. because that is the organized crime organization, the russian leadership, the russian government, putin s regime is just a and and russia people know each other. and they conspire against each other and they conspire and divide all the time in hidden fleece to get a better something like that. they re fighting inside for all of that. and that is what