Absolutely certain going to be a worthy successor to commissioner hur and we look forward to working with her. She is an attorney, was in the general counsels office at mckisson, presently not working at the moment, i understand, other than her family dutis and i told her that means that we have someone that can spend a lot of time on Ethics Commission matters. [laughter ] but were delighted to have her here, and welcome. Thank you, im delighted to be here. All right. Turning to item no. 2 on the agenda, which is Public Comment on matters appearing or not appearing on the agenda. Any comments . Commissioners, San Francisco open government, as previously stated im filing the first of a series of complaints with the directly with the Ethics Commission as november i went to the Ethics Commission and talked to two of your investigators both of whom actively discouraged me from filing complaints telling me there wasnt basis for the complaints and that is before they looked into it. The firs
Responsibility and after six hearings with the sunshine ordinance and quite a long process i can tell you that he was given notice. Absolutely. He sent whoever was in charge of sunshine ordinance complaints to the first hearing and to the second hearing and that was accompanied by the acting Environmental Review officer Sarah B Jones and because i was concerned on time because i needed the files by the last administrative hearing they told mr. Rahaim or thomas de santo mentioned earlier they were to come to the tac what is it . [inaudible] compliance and Amendments Committee and everyone agreed it would be the next wednesday, the procedural notice and they told him so mr. Ionin didnt show up at that hearing and he was taking over lulu wongs position and acting agent for mr. John rahaim. He knew about it all along so the order went to john rahaim. He was in receipt of it so to say he wasnt given notice or ability to be heard wasnt the case at all. He cheese people to hand. Handle it and
There was a referral to the Ethics Commission it was pending and they were warned that it would be that exact same search but not for the deleted emails, all emails, anything held within the custody of the Planning Department was my request, and i understand im not a political person. Like i only registered to vote which is weird but i never thought my vote mattered and i want to preface this i dont understand the politics but i understand the Ethics Commission and the relationship with the Sunshine Ordinance Task force. It seems to be strange. Because they didnt want to send the case here. I asked them to so there was accountability on behalf of those at the Planning Department and our faith in government is there is accountability and responsibility and after six hearings with the sunshine ordinance and quite a long process i can tell you that he was given notice. Absolutely. He sent whoever was in charge of sunshine ordinance complaints to the first hearing and to the second hearing
At that hearing and he was taking over lulu wongs position and acting agent for mr. John rahaim. He knew about it all along so the order went to john rahaim. He was in receipt of it so to say he wasnt given notice or ability to be heard wasnt the case at all. He cheese people to hand. Handle it and they didnt handle it at all. This is john rahaim. This is from the bay guardian of last year. Planning in San Francisco is a blood sport. Hes talking about war here. The war was to push the project forward and deny me my question is what documents double havent been produced to you at this time . Well, the search terms werent completed in their intriernity. The closest was the second cd i was given but put [inaudible] avenue in quotes which means has to be [inaudible] avenue and only return those documents but who spells out avenue. It was so minimal. If they returned the search terms in the entirety this would have been settled but now the project is approved. These are my records request t
Guardian of last year. Planning in San Francisco is a blood sport. Hes talking about war here. The war was to push the project forward and deny me my question is what documents double havent been produced to you at this time . Well, the search terms werent completed in their intriernity. The closest was the second cd i was given but put [inaudible] avenue in quotes which means has to be [inaudible] avenue and only return those documents but who spells out avenue. It was so minimal. If they returned the search terms in the entirety this would have been settled but now the project is approved. These are my records request to view files so it wasnt possible i missed anything. I was there a lot, at the Planning Department, and i needed to keep track of what was going on. Here is a letter after the second compliance and Amendments Committee no, the education outreach committee, where i made this request of the names they needed the files for and what the search terms were and what the searc