Anderson Cooper takes viewers beyond the headlines with indepth reporting and investigations. Attorney general Jeff Sessions should stop this rigged witchhunt right now before it can stain our country any longer. Bob mueller and the democrats that are doing his dirty work are a disgrace to the usa. The key sentence, Attorney General Jeff Sessions should stop this rigged witchhunt. Thats what the president said. He said stop it right now. It sounds like the president , who Chief Executive wants to see jeff session, who works for him and the russia investigation ended right now. That is what it sounds like, because that is actually what the president wrote. Unless, of course, you believe his Press Secretary and tv lawyer who scrambled to try and convince the public that what the president said about what he wants to see happen and happen right now was in no way a directive to actually make it happen and happen right now. No, according to them, it was only some guys opinion, the guy who h
Doh spicer. All right, so, the white house used to claim that the president s tweets are not just idle opinionating, theyre official statements with the power of the white house behind him. How many times have people working for the president said the president s tweet speaks for itself or words to that effect . Except for todays tweet. That apparently doesnt speak for itself. That needs a spokesperson and a tv lawyer speaking for it, sweeping up after it, quietly trying to wipe it off the bottom of their shoes. When the president of the United States says that one of his subordinates should do something and do it now, how is that just one guys opinion . It all smacks of another effort that was made recently to suggest that the president didnt really say what everyone heard him say. And a key sentence in my remarks, i said the word would instead of wouldnt. The sentence should have been, i dont see any reason why i wouldnt, or why it wouldnt be russia. Sort of a double negative. That a
and ends. it s all bleeds together. so much of the reporting is opinionating. that is the damaging thing that is happening in media now. the narrative has been made the most important priority. when you have a narrative you want to push it doesn t matter if the facts are there or not. you are going to cook up the facts. so cnn decided they have the narrative that orange man bad, bad orange man has to go and it doesn t matter what reality is. that is what they will stick to. there is a reason people don t trust them. there is a reason the media ratings and the credibility are in the tank. and the organizations like cnn, they are primarily responsible for it. if they were just honest about who they are and what they want people would cut them a lot of slack. tucker: i completely agree. it s the lying. the cover-up. the insulting disingenuousness and the falseness. makes you want to throw a beer bottle through the tv. last thing, if you see don
reporting starts and ends and where the opinionizing starts and ends.nd it all bleeds together. so much of the reporting is opinionating. that is the damaging thing that is happening in media now. the narrative has been made the most important priority. when you have a narrative you want to push it doesn t matter if the facts are there or not. you are going to cook up the facts.ot so cnn decided they have the narrative that orange man bad, bad orange man has to go, and it doesn t matter what reality is. that is what they will stick to. there is a reason people don t trust them. s r there is a reason the media ratings and the credibility are in the tank. and organizations like cnn, they are primarily responsible for it. if they were just honest about who they are and what they want, people would cut them a lot of slack. tucker: i completely agree. it s the lying. the cover-up. the insulting disingenuousness and the falseness. makes you want to throw a beer bottle through the tv. las
doh! spicer. all right, so, the white house used to claim that the president s tweets are not just idle opinionating, they re official statements with the power of the white house behind him. how many times have people working for the president said the president s tweet speaks for itself or words to that effect? except for today s tweet. that apparently doesn t speak for itself. that needs a spokesperson and a tv lawyer speaking for it, sweeping up after it, quietly trying to wipe it off the bottom of their shoes. when the president of the united states says that one of his subordinates should do something and do it now, how is that just one guy s opinion? it all smacks of another effort that was made recently to suggest that the president didn t really say what everyone heard him say. and a key sentence in my remarks, i said the word would instead of wouldn t. the sentence should have been, i don t see any reason why i wouldn t, or why it wouldn t be russia. sort of a doubl