they re considered official statements by the president of the united states. doh! spicer. so the white house used to claim that the president s tweets are not just idle opinionating, they re official statements with the power of the white house behind him. how many times have people working for the president said the president s tweet speaks for itself or words to that effect? except for today s tweet. that apparently doesn t speak for itself. that needs a spokesperson and a tv lawyer speaking for it, sweeping up after it, quietly trying to wipe it off the bottom of their shoes. when the president of the united states says one of his subordinates should do something and do it now, how is that just one guy s opinion? it all smacks of another effort that was made recently to suggest that the president didn t really say what everyone heard him say. and a key sentence in my remarks, i said the word would instead of wouldn t. the sentence should have been i don t see any reason why
and so it is sort of the least we can do and we told them we expect senator portman to do more. my understanding is that our colleague who was trying to come up with us, another mom we were going to be four moms is being arrested in the lobby. she was trying to get up with us and stayed in the lobby because they wouldn t allow her. so we re assuming they re coming to get us soon. so please, everyone, don t think about us, just focus on spreading the word and making sure that everyone gets out and votes in november and that senator portman understands that his time for opinionating has long passed and he needs to do something. it looks like the police ultimately did show up and arrest people at rob portman s office today in columbus. there other people from the group protesting outsides while the three moms sat in, in portman s office and they were arrested today. there were protests against the
it is harder. one of the reasons it is harder i have never seen an issue where reporters have leaped from reporting to opinionating. how much of the coverage has been in demand of gun control. that s something that s relatively new. there used to be borders before reporters would cross them and go into opinionated reporting. now those borders have been torn down. that s what the criticism donald trump is here he didn t take the position some in the press wanted him to take. right, and there s been a lot of criticism on the media on that, are they pushing some sort of gun control agenda. also there was criticism will the president show sufficient empathy. we saw that also after las vegas. is that a new element in way presidents are rated by the press or did you experience much the same during the george bush administration? well, i remember on september 11th, the press was pretty sharply critical of the two first speeches president bush
polarized times for this president to rally the country? it is harder. one of the reasons it is harder i have never seen an issue where reporters have leaped from reporting to opinionating. how much of the coverage has been in demand of gun control. that s something that s relatively new. there used to be borders before reporters would cross them and go into opinionated reporting. now those borders have been torn down. that s what the criticism donald trump is here he didn t take the position some in the press wanted him to take. right, and there s been a lot of criticism on the media on that, are they pushing some sort of gun control agenda. also there was criticism will the president show sufficient empathy. we saw that also after las vegas. is that a new element in way presidents are rated by the press or did you experience much the same during the george bush administration? well, i remember on september 11th, the press was pretty sharply critical of the two
greg, your theory such as it was about acting out and being able to imagine? yes. pure bunk. how can you de bunk that? i don t have to de bunk that. it is boppinged. wait, that s not ambudsing. that is opinion nateing. opinionating. eric wouldn t do that and neither would his 14-year-old son. he has a son? i explained why you don t agree. that is my theory. your theory is criminals can t imagine. they can imagine them and they enjoy imagining them and then they leads them to actually do them. no, an intelligent person can imagine the consequences of his actions and you see it all the time on cops. they get arrested like whoa, i can t believe this is happening. everybody gets arrested and it is like, oh jeez, ah eu6789!