implemented during the trumped a my opinion strikes. the boots on the ground the money, that s all there. what is so disconcerting is when our president says and does things that cause confusion, that only helps president putin. well, you are one of the most experienced people we could hear from on this matter and a measured person as well. so your comments certainly worth evaluating. thanks for staying up late with us. thanks, very much. please tell rachel i said hello. we will do that. i am happy to do that. thank you. sir. we turn to jack reid, ranking armed services committee. you heard the congressional side of foreign policy, something where you have been a leader. your reaction, sir. well, i think general hodges made extraordinarily sound points. it s disconcerting when the president attacks our most important allie, nato. als, nato exists not just for the protection of europeans, but more importantly, it s our 40
to citizens of minority faiths a message of exclusion. the dissenting opinion said the majority s opinion strikes at the very trunk of religion seeking to outlaw most prayer given in government assemblies even though such prayer has been an important part of the fabric of our democracy and civic life. and the board chair defended the tradition. we start with two things, pledge of allegiance and we re going to have a prayer. the prayers are called the solemn prayer. it is an opportunity for the commissioners to reflect and these are for the commissioners as we look for wisdom as we do business on behalf of the county. now, with the ongoing lawsuit, the county commissioners have a chaplain now give their opening prayer. rob? very interesting stuff. what s the next step here? well, of course the county is still deciding if it should appeal to the u.s. supreme court. two commissioners said they would vote for it. they will need a third to go forward. the high court has also allowed
a majority opinion the judge wrote the prayer practice served to identify the government with christianity and risk conveying to citizens of minority faith a message of exclusion. while the judge writing for dissending opinion said the majority of opinion strikes at religion seeking to outlaw most prayer given in government assemblies even though such prayer has been an important part of the fabric of our democracy and civic life. now with the on going lawsuit the county commissioner still have a chaplain open the meeting with a prayer. and the board chair defended the tradition. we start with two things, a pledge of allegiance and we re going to have a prayer. the prayers are an opportunity for the commissioners to reflect and these are for the commissioners, as we look for wisdom as we do business on behalf of the county. now, the county hasn t decided yet if it will appeal to the u.s. supreme court. now, the high court has allowed
to citizens of minority faiths a message of exclusion. the dissenting opinion said the majority s opinion strikes at the very trunk of religion seeking to outlaw most prayer given in government assemblies even though such prayer has been an important part of the fabric of our democracy and civic life. and the board chair defended the tradition. we start with two things, pledge of allegiance and we re going to have a prayer. the prayers are called the solemn prayer. it is an opportunity for the commissioners to reflect and these are for the commissioners as we look for wisdom as we do business on behalf of the county. now, with the ongoing lawsuit, the county commissioners have a chaplain now give their opening prayer. rob? very interesting stuff. what s the next step here? well, of course the county is still deciding if it should appeal to the u.s. supreme court. two commissioners said they would vote for it. they will need a third to go forward. the high court has also allowed
they won t put a stop to. bill: now we wait to see whether or not that has a legal challenge. that means probably this afternoon in arizona someone will be stopped for jaywalking. bill: it may be 12 noon arizona time. someone could be stopped for jaywalking or dwi. bill: there are numerous states going through their own definition of this law. alabama, you think about georgia, there was a challenge in indiana, south carolina. does any of this today affect those laws in other states. yes, this opinion strikes at the heart of the alabama statute. i m unfamiliar with the one in georgia, but i ve read the one in alabama. both the arizona and the alabama statute presumed that where the federal government chooses not to enforce federal immigration law the states may stand in the place of the federal government and enforce the federal law as they, the states, understand it to be. today the supreme court has said, the states may not do that, no matter how well