you re making sound points, you lived it. very brief sound here that some might have forgotten which is so relevant, mr. weisselberg provided some information in the investigation that touched on as we reported payments that he, you and donald trump arranged. this is how donald trump talked about that incident and mr. weisselberg s role. 100% he didn t. okay. 100%. he s a wonderful guy. it was a very limited, little period of time. that was a period of time not to belabor the point, as you accurately said, donald trump did not stand by you, he did publicly stand by mr. weisselberg when it was convenient for both of them. if there s a charge and indictment against weisselberg, what s going to happen in your view, and do you think mr. weisselberg could change his mind? absolutely, again, it is distinction between the investigation and indictment, and it is not just the
implemented during the trumped a my opinion strikes. the boots on the ground the money, that s all there. what is so disconcerting is when our president says and does things that cause confusion, that only helps president putin. well, you are one of the most experienced people we could hear from on this matter and a measured person as well. so your comments certainly worth evaluating. thanks for staying up late with us. thanks, very much. please tell rachel i said hello. we will do that. i am happy to do that. thank you. sir. we turn to jack reid, ranking armed services committee. you heard the congressional side of foreign policy, something where you have been a leader. your reaction, sir. well, i think general hodges made extraordinarily sound points. it s disconcerting when the president attacks our most important allie, nato. als, nato exists not just for the protection of europeans, but more importantly, it s our 40
be the nominee. we re all afraid of ron paul, i think. greg, stand up here. come on. here s the thing. there was a great blog post. i hate saying that. it was from a former ron paul staffer that was an incredibly honest take on what it was like working for ron paul. the assumption is this guy is like your crazy uncle, and you never expected him to get this far. the problem is he has sound points, but other areas he s scary. he made it clear in the blog post that ron paul hates israel. i mean, that s what a former close confidentant says. my crazy nieces think this crazy uncle got too far.
be the nominee. we re all afraid of ron paul, i think. greg, stand up here. come on. here s the thing. there was a great blog post. i hate saying that. it was from a former ron paul staffer that was an incredibly honest take on what it was like working for ron paul. the assumption is this guy is like your crazy uncle, and you never expected him to get this far. the problem is he has sound points, but other areas he s scary. he made it clear in the blog post that ron paul hates israel. i mean, that s what a former close confidentant says. my crazy nieces think this crazy uncle got too far.
so, how did he do? kind of an unlikely guest. did he win anyone over there? i think time will tell. the early forecast is not many. part of the challenge for michael steele, it seems as if he s undercut by his own party that don t want to see the outreach. those that have influence. he s been a target of rush limbaugh and others. i think he made these pronouncements but has not been able to get the support, perceived support of a lot of those in the party that want to back him in the reaching out. how do you think he did? i think he made a good speech. i think he made a good speech. i think he made some sound points. but it s hard to sell to a civil rights crowd why a party is against health care, why a party is against educational reform in the ways that they have taken