there will be. in the florida case there were 37 charges against the former president t was quite a lot and quite a surprise when it happened. and also there are allegations that the justice department can make non a indictment where they will reveal what they have been doing with the secret grand jury over the months they have been gathering evidence and that can be witness from witnesses no one knew spoke to the grand jury, remained completely secret even to lawyers working on the case, and also, of course, there is all kinds of evidence, documents, records, phone records, all kinds of things the justice department has the ability to pull in and show the grand jury when they are building the case. that stuff is often quite a surprise when the indictment is released. yeah. there is a lot hanging out there right now. i think i will quote you here. you have a long day ahead. katelyn polantz, appreciate the reporting as you always. joining us elie honig, the former u.s. attorney for
coffee market in the uk is worth double dt market. coffee market in the uk is worth double dt market. i have told you a million times double dt market. i have told you a million times that double dt market. i have told you a million times that you double dt market. i have told you a million times that you are double dt market. i have told you a million times that you are missing l million times that you are missing out, but you are missing out. i’m million times that you are missing out, but you are missing out. i m on a natural high out, but you are missing out. i m on a natural high anyway, out, but you are missing out. i m on a natural high anyway, louise! - out, but you are missing out. i m on a natural high anyway, louise! 1. out, but you are missing out. i m on a natural high anyway, louise! i wasj a natural high anyway, louise! i was thinking about this. obviously you have got two weeks left on this problem. you have your espressojust before six o clock. what is g
finding out what involvement russia had, then why would they have bent over backwards as andy mccarthy says, to avoid investigating hillary and indicting her and bent overve fr words to indict and implicate auntie jack president trump. why would they have deceived the fisa court if it was an innocent investigation? why would it have presented flimsy evidence that paid for by clintons sponsored group, funneled through the law firm. if it wasn t necessary, innocent investigation, why can t they just present real evidence? and said they deceived the source as to the fact that christopher steele had been fired by the fbi and after the fact that sid blumenthal and others had provided information, and it was a souk circular bootstrapping. based onon a report that was gin