nine months before mueller was in the investigation and he was researching this. he was also responsible for investigating hillary which he said they did not do. this to me goes against everything our constitution says. that a few individuals inside the d.o.j. and f.b.i. could try to control something and put an outcome to an election that just because they philosophically didn t agree. the conclusion that this bias that was evident and apparent by some officials they said it didn t affect official duties. no way. the bias? look what they said. peter said he wanted president trump to lose 100 million to zero. he said he wasn t going to give up and not let him become president. he said viva la resistance. the mueller investigation, they re part of the investigation now. eric: what would you ask him on wednesday? i would like to know the timing of where it was. his philosophical opinion and why did he say what he said?
finding out what involvement russia had, then why would they have bent over backwards as andy mccarthy says, to avoid investigating hillary and indicting her and bent overve fr words to indict and implicate auntie jack president trump. why would they have deceived the fisa court if it was an innocent investigation? why would it have presented flimsy evidence that paid for by clintons sponsored group, funneled through the law firm. if it wasn t necessary, innocent investigation, why can t they just present real evidence? and said they deceived the source as to the fact that christopher steele had been fired by the fbi and after the fact that sid blumenthal and others had provided information, and it was a souk circular bootstrapping. based onon a report that was gin
that it was an innocuous investigation to find out what involvement russia had, why would they have bent over backwards to avoid investigating hillary and indieting her and bend over forward to indict and implicate deject president trump. why would they deceive the fisa court if it was an innocent investigation? why would it have flimsy evidence paid for by a clinton sponsored group and numbered through the law firm if it was necessary. why can t they have real evidence? the fact that steele had been fired by the f.b.i. to the fact that blumenthal provided information.
that it was an innocuous investigation to find out what involvement russia had, why would they have bent over backwards to avoid investigating hillary and indieting her and bend over forward to indict and implicate deject president trump. why would they deceive the fisa court if it was an innocent investigation? why would it have flimsy evidence paid for by a clinton sponsored group and numbered through the law firm if it was necessary. why can t they have real evidence? the fact that steele had been fired by the f.b.i. to the fact that blumenthal provided information. this was based on a report
had to deal with. this investigation spiralled out of the evidence that came ford when we started to realize that mccabe was at the center of this, comey, text messages, the investigation that michael horowitz has done. laura: sean, hold that thought. we have congressman mark meadows from the house freedom caucus. congressman meadows, we for months have been saying how did you have the same people who were investigating hillary s private e-mail server also oversee the investigation into donald trump s possible collusion with the russians? we saw that with peter strzok. we found his text messages and now the conclusion by the office of professional responsibility about andrew mccabe leading to his firing tonight. your reaction to this huge