about these hillary clinton films, one a documentary, the other an entertainment film, which is all about a bad item. a movie. and a lot of news people would say, including nbc news people, including chuck todd and all the rest of us, a really bad idea, given the timing. that somehow, whatever the content of it, it feels like a really bad idea in this moment for a news organization to be producing entertainment about a potential candidate. but, just to add to all the confusion, yesterday, the new york times broke that fox right, i love this? that a vision of fox may actually join in as a coproducer of the hillary clinton this is my favorite wrinkle in the story. so everything that sinks must converge. and i definitely think that media consolidation, which we ve been keeping an eye on for 20-plus years, is a causing strange bedfellows, but this may be the even strangest. so is reince priebus going to go
owned by the same corporation but not the same thing. i sim pa these with chuck todd and aaron burnett erin burnett said cnn was a division of the media. this business about a firewall is an utter kinard unless things have changed since i left nbc and msnbc. and very skilled, an answer core at nbc said this. take a listen. here you have the republican chairman, i would say, understandably miffed ab these hillary clinton films, one a documentary, the other an entertainment film, which is, you know, all about bad idea? a bad idea? a lot of news people would say including nbc news people including chuck todd and the rest of us, a really bad idea given the timing. it s one thing to do a movie about somebody after they leave the oval office, another one to do beforehand that could propel that person into office,