woman s body and not listening to the wil of the people, and the will of women in this moment jen reuben, this is bee your point, right? when you, you sort of, you position on abortion evolved it was that recognition, right that this is actually abou bodily autonomy. that s the part that seems weird here the fall of roe intellectually, an ideologically, one thing but the things that we r seeing in some of thes legislations, that are happening, it seems draconia and something entirely different. they do, you see how radica this is. remember, this was a party tha favored judicial humility, judicial restraint, and firs of all, the striking down of roe after nearly 50 years wa based upon a reasoning that wa faulty on the history of fault on the law, it was an active judicial radicalism. so for anyone who thinks o themselves as a constitutional conservative, as someone who respects the rule of law, th rule of law does not entai ripping up a precedent that ha
least in abrams and i will pay catherine, thank you for being with us. happy to be here. happy easter thank you, and you. i m trying to put some meat on the bones of all of the things that are happening with donald trump. everybody watched hi indictment, his arrest, hi arraignment in new york. and then the next hearing in that case isn t december a some point what happens with that case an everything else i describe between now and the next tim donald trump is scheduled to b in court you re right, he is swirlin in legal issues around him civil and criminal on the manhattan case, the nex date is december 4th but in between that, there might be litigation, in fact there will be litigation i know the arrangements, the prosecutors said that they wanted to protect order, under new york state law, the defens is entitled to almos everything that s in the prosecutors file that is the law. this prosecutor said, you know what there is some sense but have materials that we don t trus the fo
who live in red america woul look around and say why is m states so, why isn t running s poorly why don t we have economic growth why don t we have young people who want to move here? why don t we have a level of personal safety like they do i blue america i think if they look around, we ll see that there is this toxic ideology that is holding them back. i think once they begin to loo around and say, you know, th things that these people are talking about, it s no affecting my life. what is affecting my life fo these radical policies tha they keep putting in place so i would certainly hope that as you say, that when people sit down to vote, and they consider their choices particularly at the state level, april is so right. that is so much more important in the lives of most people, i affects so many more aspects o their lives. that they will consider, wha is this ideology doing to me and my family? and you have a state lik wisconsin, they re facing 19th century law that would ba aborti
april, at one point during the fall of roe v. wade, lindsey graham have proposed a nationa anti abortion law, a federal law. and mitch mcconnell had said, think most members of my conference prefer that this be dealt with at the state level. on one hand this was lindsey graham saying i don t want t touch this thing i don t want to catch this this fall of roe v. wade but the other, giving back t the states, which used to soun quite innocuous, and ver american, it is not turned out very well. the states have demonstrated what they do when you, when yo hand them the right to control women s bodies right, exactly. and this is, this is going bac to something i know people - this is really controversial for people the issue of states right, it everything, everything is goin back to states right voting rights, so many other issues it s about what the state does even this gun legislation issue, gun measures but when it comes to abortion, this nation is broken in fractured. we have safe stat
nature you say, it is easier not to have to think about it, yo just paid for yourself you know, it s the better rule to take because then you don t get into these gray areas, about does this fall withi some kind of exception now, that is to be above reproach but should a supreme court justice not be above reproach? i think that s the questio here again, it s a standard o conduct, not necessarily a rul or a law in california, you have something that is akin t addressing this issue of wha hospitality is i mean, i never thought i d be discussing what is in what i in hospitality but there are, you interpret this in certain way. hospitality is, for instance,? what would qualify as acceptin hospitality not a gift yeah, i think every judge i the country, i think falls under some code of ethics, probably with the exception of the supreme court. but, so, these, i went back an read the california judicial code of ethics