trying to do today. he s also there to meet the lizards, and the illuminati, and the cabal of jewish label makers. here s something else to know about what happened today and where it appears it s not going. first of all, on last night s show, we cover that blockbuster federal court hearing yesterday were nine pro trump lawyers are facing sanctions. these are pro trump lawyers that brought a lawsuit based on all these crazy conspiracy theories. those pro trump lawyers are not facing personal sanctions and potentially disbarment for their trying to use the court system to advance. this factory fantasy to undermine the confidence in the elections. we covered last night that hearing yesterday in a federal court in michigan, where the judge seemed to indicate that sanctions and potentially disbarment are on the table for all nine of those trump lawyers. in addition to that, though is,
military. last night on air during our show the resist to changes necessary to crack down on sexual predators in the armed forces is not a partisan difference between democrats and republicans but rather an institutional fight between congress and the pentagon and the president called today s meeting, it appears, to try and play the role of mediator. still there is the question of how difficult will it be to get this done politically. a question a former marine corps veteran and now executive director of service women s action network tried to action for us on last night s show. we re dealing with habit and tradition. it is military deference has become almost like a physical habit. right? where we assume that military leadership always knows best when it comes to issues in the military. it absolutely does not know best. there should be no politician, democrat or republican, who even hesitates to support this kind of legislation. joining me tonight, spencer ackerman, senior wired
necessary to crack down on sexual predators in the armed forces is not a partisan difference between democrats and republicans but rather an institutional fight between congress and the pentagon and the president called today s meeting, it appears, to try and play the role of mediator. still there is the question of how difficult will it be to get this done politically. a question a former marine corps veteran and now executive director of service women s action network tried to action for us on last night s show. we re dealing with habit and tradition. it is military deference has become almost like a physical habit. right? where we assume that military leadership always knows best when it comes to issues in the military. it absolutely does not know best. there should be no politician, democrat or republican, who even hesitates to support this kind of legislation. joining me tonight, spencer ackerman, senior wired for the danger room. he goes to work every day in the pentagon.
and we discovered it last night on the air, during our show. is that resistance to change is necessary to crackdown on sexual predators in the armed forces. they are not a partisan difference between democrats and republicans. rather an institutional fight between congress and the pentagon. the president called today s meeting, it appears, to try to play the role of mediator. a question a former marine corps veteran and now executive director of service women s action network tried to answer for us on last night s show. we re dealing with habit and tradition. it is military deference has become almost like a physical habit. right? where we assume that military leadership always knows best when it comes to issues in the military. it absolutely does not know best. there should be no politician, democrat or republican, who even hesitates to support this kind of legislation. joining me tonight, spencer
bullish in the court striking down the defense of marriage act. a potentially contentious exchange between ted olson and john roberts. i read most of it rather than listened it to. no. it was justice scalia. at what point did it become unconstitutional to deny marriage rights to same-sex couples, and ted olson said when did it become unconstitutional to deny that to interracial couples? and he said don t answer my question with a question. this came up repeatedly, the same logic that caused the country to change its mind to tell interracial couples you can t be married should apply to same-sex couples as well. you saw it referenced by the attorney general of california a moment ago on the show. he gave the right answer to it, but i wish he cited precedent for it, a slam dunk for it.