then, intimidation and bullying. whistle blow arers say they are facing the doj s wrath for speaking out. the fbi will crush you. this government will crush you ask your family if you try to expose the truth about things they arehat doing that are wrol wero areng all examples of that. maria: coming up, house judiciar y committee chairman jim jordan on the weaponization of jon ofe biden s government.me plusnt, why did the fbi leadersp tell agents to report on trumptn collusion only orally and not keep a paper trail? the durham report finallyy released five years after then-intelligence committee chairman devin nuñes broke the news first right here on this prograthm five years ago.am devin nuñes is bac fk with moreu the fbi s politics-led investigations. then, he s threatening to hold antony blinken in contempty of congress many if hi bs biden s botched afghanistan withdrawal. house foreign affairs committee chairman michael mccaul on. afghanistan, china and why joend bid
then, intimidation and bullying. whistleblowers say they are facing the doj s wrath for speaking out. the fbi will crush you. this government will crush you. and your family. if you try to expose the truth about things that they are doing that are wrong. we are all examples of that. maria: coming up, house judiciary committee chairman jim jordan on the weaponnyization of joe biden s government. plus, why did the fbi leadership tell agents to report on trump collusion only orally and not keep a paper trail? the durham report finally released five years after then-intelligence committee chairman kevin none yesterday broke the news first right on this program five years ago. devin nuñes is back with more on the fbi s politics-led investigations. then, he s threatening to hold antony blinken in contempt of congress many in the his investigation of biden s botched afghanistan withdrawal. chairman michael mccaul on afghanistan, china and why joe biden is about to send an additio
startling details. the devil is in the details. donald trump had no basis, no reason, no legal basis to retain those documents at mar-a-lago. there could be numerous others that are charged, not just donald trump, as well as additional crimes that could be charged. is she kidding me? now, she might be getting that idea from one of the small parts of the affidavit that was curiously left unredacted. like on page 30 where it referred to president trump and those around him as, quote, criminal parties. but still didn t provide any evidence to prove it. it also warned that releasing the affidavit would give trump and his team the opportunity to flee or destroy evidence stored electronically or otherwise. flee? really? trump s plane has his name on it. and destroy electronic evidence. do they mean something like doing, i don t know, deleting 33,000 e-mails? we re going to get into that more in moments with our legal panel. but if anyone thinks that the doj is an impartial
sod a lot oque franf really ine and quite frankly, startling d details. et d the devilon is inal the deo and i ll trump had no basis, no reason, no legal basis to retain those documents at mart r a lago. e there could be numerous there could be numerous just donald trumadp as well as additional crimes that coulds be charged. hee getting th is she kidding me? now, she mightat be getting tht idea from one of the smalls parts of the affidavit that was curiously left unredacted likerr on page thirty . we re referring to presidentum trump and p and those around hi quote, criminal parties, but stilstl didn t provide any evidence to prove it. it also warned that t releasinthgs team the affidavit would give trump and his team the opportunity to flee t or destroy evidence stord electronically and otherwise fleed . on really, trump s plane has hisan name on itde and destroyhing electronic evidence. do they mean doing something like, i don t know, deleting lit thirty three thousa
showed up to navarro s home and served him with a subpoena specifically asking him to provide to a grand jury documents related to his refusal to comply with the house select committee. including any communications that he had had with former president trump or his lawyers. peter navarro has been public about his efforts to undermine the outcome of the 20 20 election. he was subpoenaed by the committee last february and refused to comply with that, citing executive privilege. the committee, though, at the time, said look, there s a lot of things we want to talk to you about that you ve spoken about publicly. you have published in your book, and that would not be covered by executive privilege. come in and answer our questions. he refused to do that. he refused to provide any documents. the house voted to refer him to the justice department for criminal contempt. he s been indicted by a grand jury. what happens next in the legal process? he s expected to appear in court la