Back in 2019, British Police services paid attention to this, to the circumstances of strange deaths, but all this was postponed for later. Now we see a picture, and what a picture it is, it is a picture of intimidation, consistent and brutal. Navalnys murder, after all , sends a clear signal that. To spain the pilot who flew to the ukrainian side. And if you look at the kremlins comments, there is triumph. I think it is also important that these very days it was struck in an absolutely serious way that russian oppositionists living outside the country must take a new look at their own. And this is evidenced by the murder of navalny and the beginning of the qualification of some public figures as terrorists by the kremlin. The kremlin started to give not only incomprehensible titles of foreign agents, which do not have a strong and dangerous projection, but rather extremist terrorists. Was called a terrorist and extremist by the kremlin, one of the first. Now they enroll new people the
Against the enemy, carrying out using mig29, 127, 124 aircraft, and today from the commander of the air force appeared like this, well extremely interesting information, Commander Oleschuk thanked the pilots for the targeted attack on the russian command post. He wrote that thank you for the successful work, the general did not provide any other details, but it is said that there was. There is even a video of information that this control point was located on a barge, this barge stood somewhere in the millennium, so now we see exactly this video, combat work was carried out on march 11 in the kherson region, but what is interesting, hysteria is now spreading in the russian public, that probably on this Command Point was general teplynskyi, on the one hand the commander of the Airborne Forces of the russian federation, and on the other hand the man who from. Teplinsky is right there , well, a highly experienced general, and if it is really the case that teplinsky was on this borsch, the
That is why we must give a clear signal to the world that the leaders who unleash an aggressive war will be held accountable for it. The International Criminal court issued two more arrest warrants for highranking russian officers and said they were likely involved in crimes during the Missile Campaign against ukraines Energy Infrastructure during from october 22 to march 2023. Is this a small step, or is it all that significant, as the investigation of specific crimes committed on your territory begins . Its definitely not a small step, its a big step. First of all, i must recognize the incredible speed of international justice, because it is about the deliberate destruction of the Energy Infrastructure last year, and only a year later the international. The criminal court released the first results. Of course, this also became possible thanks to cooperation with ukrainian Law Enforcement agencies, which helped identify the ship, missiles and their commanders. So it was a good example
You have national tribunals, you have an International Criminal court, why create another tribunal . The problem is that we are faced with a lack of accountability because there is no International Court that can prosecute putin, the senior Political Leadership and the senior military command of russia. State for the crime of aggression, even the icc does not have such jurisdiction, unfortunately, but everyone these crimes that we are currently documenting are the result of crime, aggression or the result of their leaderships decision to plan and wage this war, if we want to prevent something worse in the future, we must punish the state and its leaders that start such wars today, precisely therefore , we must sense this gap in capabilities and. Create a special tribunal on aggression and bring putin, lukashenka and their entourage to justice. Is there progress on this matter . I know that there were discussions, it seems that they were western countries say yes, in principle, but in p
Patterns and be ready for what awaits us, both during the war and after the war ends, no matter how it ends, and it is quite difficult to keep this framework of freedom and human rights democracies, when survival instincts come to the fore, and this is understandable, it is not some fault, it is just. A context in which a responsible person has to rely even more on selfreflection, and simply every day, making a thousand decisions , it is difficult to remember what we are fighting for, but what gives me optimism is the fact that when you open any research for all these years regarding ukrainians and values, ukrainians are always placed in the hierarchy of values freedom first. And the perception of freedom, it generally implies an obligation, but right here it is important to understand whether freedom is a tool for building a civilized country, or freedom is an element for an anarchic perception of oneself and the state and oneself in the state, this is a very correct question, because