good to see you i m yasmin vossoughian. we are following news on several fronts today. he was on a mission to kill. he was out hunting. a mission to kill, a suspected serial killer caught in california after a reign of terror as he was out hunting for his next victim. we are going to have a live report on that coming up, we are also covering politics everybody. just 23 days until the midterm elections. that will decide who controls congress. we will take you live to georgia, where everybody is watching for the latest in the senate race there. a day look before early voting begins. also, caught on camera. a republican elections official taped stealing democratic signs. we are going to look at what else republicans are doing leading up to a whole bunch, today. will he actually do it? speculation today that the former president may actually say yes to testifying before the january 6th committee. we will have that to you, live as well. shocking showing california. stopped in
you really only see the back of his head, linked to these six killings and an attempted statement by ian stockton in oakland. police say that the public weighed in with hundreds of tips to the point where, when this man was allegedly out hunting for his next victim, the police were also on his trail. tips come into the department of stockton crime stoppers where we are able to get it zero in on a suspect. our surveillance team followed this person while he was driving. we watched his patterns and determined early this morning that he was on a mission to kill. he was out hunting, also armed with a firearm and taken into custody. we are sure we stopped another killer. in custody s 43 year old wesley brown, authorities say
trump for the 1984 case next month under this new york law that you briefly mentioned, that opens up the statute of limitations in these cold cases. old, i should say, abuse cases. what would you see come from that? it is a separate cause of action and separate case. in some ways it may be a bit cleaner than this one. this one relies on the idea of defamation. there is a little bit about boot straps argument to reach back to the prior rape case to say that when he falsely denied it and said many ugly things about each viqueira, he was defaming her. that can also be a very high standard. she is someone in the public domain, so you might need to show acting with malice. if you can, instead, proceed under the new statute it is new so there is a bit of legal uncertainty there. you can go directly to the issue of whether he did or did not sexually assault her in 1984. as always, great to see you today, barbara.