Also. Competing. Thank you very much, also kate competing. Thank you very much, also. Kate winslet competing. Thank you very much, also. Kate winslet is competing. Thank you very much, also. Kate winslet is back also. Kate winslet is back talking abOut her new movie and her new attitude, too. Her new attitude, too. Laura, life is too her new attitude, too. Laura, life is too short, her new attitude, too. Laura, life is too short, you her new attitude, too. Laura, life is too short, you know . L her new attitude, too. Laura, life is too short, you know . I | life is too short, you know . I dont life is too short, you know . I dont want life is too short, you know . I dont want to look back and go, why worry dont want to look back and go, why worry abOut that . So i dont why worry abOut that . So i dont worry any more. The editor of dont worry any more. The editor of the dont worry any more. The editor of The Sun dont worry any more. The editor of The Sun and dont worry any more. Iie edi
Irs Whistle Blowers saying something coming to government treat the bidens different and informant claiming the biden family had been bribed. Should you ignore that or investigate that. Only way to investigate is impeach inquiry and the committee has the power to get all the documents they need. Paul lets bring in Wall Street Journal columnist kim sto is, sle and strossle and brian mcgun. They didnt seem to agree on the terms of the agreement. Its a first for me. What why did they not think on the same page here . Yeah, i mean, its absolutely mind boggling, paul. But, look, the central issue seems to be whether or not there was a Wink Nod Deal between the two the judge exposed specifically over the question of whether or not hunter biden was getting an Immunity Agreement related to other charges in the investigation. There was a paragraph in the Diversion Deal laying that out. Hunters team clearly viewed as completely making him immune from future charges and the problem that the prose
wouldn t take long to wash yourself off. getting that cart, and head back to the house. and then at 9:02, the defendant over there who wouldn t even admit until forced to that he was even at the scene, all of a sudden he is as busy as he s ever been. 9:02 to 9:06, 283 steps. 9:03, we see the system start up on the car, that could mean he s close by the car, as he returned with maggie s phone and placed it in that car, and then, what do we see from 9:02 to 9:06, not on four-minute period, but he s su doing. what were you doing? and everybody though he has a photographic memory, he could not answer what he s doing during this four-minute period that is so illustrating of what we re talking about here. for four minutes he is not only going 283 steps. this is a defense exhibit, defense 156. 283 steps. and they put in the distance. we heard the distance isn t as accurate. it illustrates the point. that s 208 meters. meter, you know, roughly is a yard, a little bit more, a little b
and charm, it is you, lawrence. i trust you will get to them of, what the wife of clarence thomas, the activists, an election denier, ginni thomas, said in those four walls. we might not but we are going to try. we will do the best we can with congressman schiff, and then andrew weissmann will join us with the latest ruling of judge today. i saw the discussion of, it alex, and i want to try a different take. i am prepared with professor weisman, and a law professor, and he will grade me on this. one, it doesn t matter, and it was a criminal investigation, on the classified documents. and to, they might be right. donald trump should be able to protect his right to a criminal defense in court on the question of what about these documents, possibly, being planted. the normal place for that to come up, is in cross-examination of fbi agents in court. it may be that it is a good thing, that he is allowed to continue to hold on to that, all the way through a criminal trial, becaus
a law professor at nyu of so he will grade me on this. but i think one, it doesn t matter, it s kind of an academic ruling at this point since the investigation investigation on the classified documents. good evening. and two, she might be right. donald trump should be able to protect his right to a criminal defense in court on the question of what about these documents, possibly, being planted. the normal place for that to come up, is in cross-examination of fbi agents in court. it may be that it is a good thing, that he is allowed to continue to hold on to that, all the way through a criminal trial, because, would we be running the risk of reversible error in an appeal if donald trump lost that right to that argument, now, through a special master? all of that is for, professor weisman, later, actually coming right up in our first segment. i guarantee, politically, the ultimate legal outcome. we will hear donald trump repeat a lot, his claims, that may be something happen