Mail. Thank you for your time, sir. Guest thanks for having me. I hope everyone stays well out there and that we have a robust election in november. Now, amberng us mcreynolds of the National Vote at home coalition, she is the ceo, good morning. Guest good morning. Host tell us about your organization, what it does, and who supports it. We are a 501 c 3 nonprofit and have been in existence for about 2. 5 years and our entire goal has been to help states and policymakers improve the vote at home and by mail processes in every state. That one of the issues you deal with is this idea of voter fraud info by mail. What has your experience been in looking at the system overall . Is there fraud there . System that any includes a lot of human beings and processes has inherent risks. Need,nly, recognize the and this is a focused area of hours to ensure that those critical security measures are in place to find and detect bad actors and whole them accountable to not only protect the system but m
The chief justice and associate justices of the Supreme Court of the United States. All persons having business before the honorable Supreme Court of the United States or admonished to get their attention. We will hear the argument this morning takes 1946 the United States patent and Trademark Office versus booking. Com. Mr. Chief justice, and may i please the court, it is a principle of the trademark law no party can continue for a generic term like wine or green. The act confirmed the generic term is never entitled to trademark protection matter how much money and effort the user has poured into promoting the merchandise and what success it has achieved in the public identification. In other words, the meetings require distinctiveness and irrelevant to the generic terms. It is undisputed that its generic for the Reservation Service responding. Respondents could entirely register and the quick filed the addition of the designation like company or ca doesnt have a taxable mark. Thats b
Money. Well go right to the boards today and show you a sea of red. Dow is down 600 points s p 500 down about 3 . Nasdaq, technology has been, as you know, a bright spot of late but thats selling off harder today. Nasdaq down about 300 points all right rob, good to see you, beard and all. Here we are in different place than we were on march 20th when you spoke about the pessimism being palpable in the market that we were in panic mode, as you said almost speaking that things needed to turn in a more positive way nonetheless, josh brown, ill come to you. The point i was going to make is there was a point in time where pessimism was palpable now were at a different place we have come a long way. The second day into this week well have our back to back down days if this holds today how should we be thinking about stocks here . Im glad you cut to me. Robs beard looks like it sold some kids fake id in an alley somewhere. Lets talk about that palpable sense of optimism. People that changed t
Attorney who will provide legal advice this evening. At the controls is the boards Legal Process clerk and i am julie, the boards executive director. We will be joined by representatives from the city departments with cases before the board this evening. We have the administrator planning the Planning Commission and joseph duffy, senior building inspector. The Board Meeting guidelines are follows. The boards turnoff and silence electronic devices. Appellants and Department Respondents have 7 minutes to present the case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated must include the comments within this period. Members of the public not affiliated with the parties have three minutes each to address the board and no rebuttal. If you have questions about requesting a rehearing, please email the board staff at board of appeals at sfgovtv. This is broadcast live on sfgovtv cable channel 78 and will be rebroadcast on friday. It is available on the website and downloaded from sfgovtv. Org. We
Were proposing two things. As the addition was pitched to us as a green room or garden room, a place to get direct sun light and do some light gardening, if that is the case, why not keep this front area open and make it sort of a green roof or terrace with plants . This would be more practical and intent for its intents and purposes. This solution would eliminate all concern about the new mass and the topography of the street. This would be a large green area, sunny and exposed, where they could take care of plants. If this solution seems too radical, we would like the project to get a larger set back from the street. Maybe this should be revisited. Also, the height of the building, while under the 35foot limit, should be adjusted on either side. Simply being in line and simply being in line with current roof from the previously addition seems to make a lot of sense and be less disruptive to the street. We do have four other neighbors on our side of the street who feel similarly to us