The form of non v. A. Care and choice care to get this right. If i can make two quick observations. Youre absolutely spot on. First of all we have to force ourselves to make certain decisions about what care can be most efficiently delivered in the community. So weve talked before my example the chairman remembers optometry. Why would we send a veteran 100 miles to get his eyes checked and get some glasses . We can do that anywhere. We wouldnt we routinely be referring that out to the community unless a veteran really wants to come to va. We are learning right now, again working to manage towards requirements rather than just a budget number, every time we improve access to care with a new facility, with additional staff, demand changes. Part of what were trying to understand are what are the dynamics. For example, you look in phoenix where we know were under penetrated in the veteran market. We improve access to care and we get a disproportionate response back. Weve got to understand
I used to work for a company come and Large Companies of about 20,000 employees. Our insurance ran for all of us was around 400 a month. Thats the full cost to the company. For the Health Insurance. Now, and what weve got here is a situation that were trying to fix this and if we want to fix this what we would really do is say, take the Health Insurance, turn it all into individual policies. In its companies wanted to pay for each employees insurance, they could pay it is an individual policy. In other words, each individual policy, and theres a model for this. Aflac does this all the time. Host can you wrap this up very quickly . Caller if they wanted to do this host we got the point. Guest thanks. Personal with regard to sincerity i hope you realize that we are very sincere that the Affordable Care act isnt going to work, its not good for america to help america gets the message thats what weve been saying since we got elected as majority of house and 2010. With regards to the idf, y
[applause] good morning thanks to ppi for the invitation. With deals like a lot longer but i have been at the fcc a little less than one year. And in the Commission Time barely a blip on the radar but under the chairmans leadership were moving at a very fast pace taking on many complex issues so by way of example we have options incentive option will will spectrum infrastructure spectrum said frontier. 17 Competitive Bidding rules joint bidding rules competition policy and i suspect the pace will not let up anytime soon. What we are busy working on these issues the Wireless Industry continues to involved in challenging ways but we just dont see challenges and that is what i want to talk about todays opportunity that we see in those with arab agenda at the bureau more specifically we see opportunity with Wireless Infrastructure to make more spectrum available is a new ways with Broadband Demand and to promote and protect the marketplace also to promote innovation was divert Devices Netw
Wireless technology. [laughter] he has a masters science from stanford we will lean on that heavily particularly with my first questions i will begin. Each question is directed to one panelist but i encourage you to weigh in to get the conversation going. Talk about neutrality and how this relates to wireless but putting that engineering degree to work advocates of strong neutrality where they pay for priority they are worried everyone will get a lower quality of service in this would be legitimate concern but does priority necessarily entail a sacrifice of the quality of service . Is a possible to introduce priority without degrading the quality. It depends if it is the zero sum game or not from an engineering perspective i do not view it as such maybe we do have restraint of capacity this there the wired networks so prioritizing certain types in the system does not necessarily have any adverse effect. As an economist in light of the answer is not have a sacrifice that there could be
A concerning the ability to identify high value uses and direct the money in that way. They would have a way of healthrelated gaps in real time. What is it that directly related to people that have priority and do it in a way that gets funded in a different way. So when we are talking about Business Models here, Business Models is not an abstract work that says some people make money and some people dont. It has to do with this sort of services you can deliver to consumers in a way it works. And i am grateful for the question because when we applied that neutrality to mobile where we have a constrained environment, you know, neutrality in its purest sense, everyone should be treated the same way. Your potential customer, somebody who has medical monitoring gets treated exactly the same way as somebody who is downloading a youtube field. And if you are not allowed to prioritize somebody with a heart monitor over somebody who plays the game because all usage is supposed to be exactly the