Good afternoon, everyone. Notwithstanding the change in the schedule, were going to start on time, the new time. So, on behalf of myself and bob wise, who is my supremely and talented collegial codirector of the nyu law schools legislative and regulatory process clinic, i wanted to welcome you here today to the fourthyear of the form. Forum. We are joined by another nyu law entity. A nonpartisan, multidisciplinary director, and the rachel called brenner, who is here, has been invaluable in helping pull together the programs this afternoon. This forum would not be possible without the generous support of a Renowned International law firm. It gives me great pleasure to partnere peter ross, a in the chicago office, who knows a lot about what we are talking about today. He served his district for six terms, from 2002019. He chaired the house ways and means subcommittee on oversight, where he championed efforts that were supported on a bipartisan basis to overhaul the irss civil Asset Forfe
Guy lets see what is happening. Stocks are higher in europe. We are getting a lift from italian banks, which bounced back after being hit yesterday. The Italian Government may be backing off on the windfall narrative. But european gas at one point was up by 40 . This is a story that relates to shortages out of australia as result of industrial action, but this is the fear, that we can seek shortages this winter. This is highlighting that risk again. It is going to feed into the inflation narrative. It could be something that comes back again this winter as a big problem. This is a competitor to we work. We work goes away. I wg benefits. It is not all doom and gloom when it comes to the office story. Iwg up nearly 10 on the back of that wework narrative. Alix the s p is down by. 3 . I want a couple things to tease out here. In one of the most active stocks today, it is spending a lot of cash. They say the demand is there. They say they can produce the cars. There are still supply chain
Just ahead on cnn newsroom. Pushing back. Donald trumps legal team says that a protective order proposed by the Special Counsel would infringe on his First Amendment right. We will look at whether that has any legal merit. Severe weather across the u. S. Ripping off roofs, taking down power lines and disrupting more than 10,000 flights. Details on the plot ukraine says it foiled to assassinate president Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Good to have you with us. The judge in Donald Trumps Election Subversion Case appears ready to move forward quickly. She is looking to schedule a hearing this week on how to handle evidence and what trump can say publicly about the case. Prosecutors and Defense Attorneys are facing a three pm eastern deadline. 13 hours from now to come up with options. The Justice Department wants restrictions on trump. Fearing that he could disclose Sensitive Information or intimidate potential witnesses. The former president s attorneys say that would infringe on his First Amendme
Are the first six on the list. Yes. Did ou are the first six on the list. Yes. Did you have are the first six on the list. Yes. Did you have responsibility are the first six on the list. Yes. Did you have responsibility for l are the first six on the list. Yes. Did you have responsibility for any of those . , did you have responsibility for any of those . Lilo. Can we did you have responsibility for any of those . Ilo. Can we turn to page of those . No. Can we turn to page three . Sorry. Of those . No. Can we turn to page three . Sorry, not of those . No. Can we turn to page three . Sorry, not at of those . No. Can we turn to page three . Sorry, not at the of those . No. Can we turn to page three . Sorry, not at the time, of those . No. Can we turn to page three . Sorry, not at the time, i i three . Sorry, not at the time, i didnt. Three . Sorry, not at the time, i didnt nor three . Sorry, not at the time, i didnt. Nor in three . Sorry, not at the time, i didnt. Nor in december three .
Picture which is inconsistent of the position as i understood it to be. That is another one of these things where, that is another one of these things where, is that is another one of these things where, is she getting the right information from her staff . She never information from her staff . She never attended these meetings. Never ever attended one of the Working Group ever attended one of the working Group Meetings to the best of my knowledge. This Group Meetings to the best of my knowledue. Group meetings to the best of my knowledge Group Meetings to the best of my knowledue. , ,. ,. , knowledge. This is to be set against the context of knowledge. This is to be set against the context of the knowledge. This is to be set against the context of the email knowledge. This is to be set againstl the context of the email discussion the context of the E Mail Discussion which is how do we inform the ministers replied to this letter without describing that we have. Without disclosing that