The committee im proceeding under the rule. I wonder how this panel can opine as to whether the president committed an impeachment offense and the answer quite frankly is because you came in with a preconceived notion. You already made that determination and decision. Ill give you a for instance. Until the recent collocolloquy, several of you said the president said i would like you to do me a favor. But that was inaccurate. And im going to read it to you. I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot. One of you said well thats because the president was using royal we. Here the president is talking about the country. Thats what hes talking about. Its audacious to say its using the royal we. Thats royal, all right but it aint the royal we. And ill just tell you, when you come in with a preconceived notion it becomes obvious. One of you just said, mr. Feldman it was you who said, and im going to quote here, roughly, i think this is exactly what you
President might betray his trust to a foreign power. Can you elaborate on why the framers were so concerned about foreign interference . How they accounted for these concerns and how that relates to the facts before this committee . So the reason that the framers are concerned about foreign interference is slightly different than the reason we are. They were concerned about it because we were such a weak country in 1789. We were small, we were poor. We didnt have an established navy. We didnt have an established army. Today the concern is a little different so it would interfere with us making it best for us as americans. Second based on the president s own summary of his call with the you yukrainian president he used it as leverage in his efforts to achieve this and third the president then urged china to begin its own investigation. Professor feldman, how did it impact our democracy if it become Standard Practice for the president of the United States to ask a Foreign Government to i
Conference calling to defend the freedom of the press. Those are the headlines this hour you can find more on these and many other stories. For now though its the cards report and if youre in the states you. Because youre this is the guys very poor we are going to maintain their San Francisco great event put on by a big going magazine but a great speaker of great talk about theyre going to fully embracing a new leg of its bull market very exciting action susie yes well you know were in our whole Summer Solutions beginning of that happening were in summer were into la its all like happening and we have this remarkable tweet here and its from another big player because you know this big move that weve seen a big client and its still very volatile and you know you do your own research of course when whenever buying restacking sats as they call it and never invest more than you can afford to lose but here is the latest movement in big. What is quite apparent and has been discussed at this
Family Office Accounts Corporate Accounts various manage money accounts is over 100 trillion just sitting there looking for something to preserve wealth and that something will be increasingly big coin well says. Everyone agree with out. There on there im getting the standing ovation now wherever i go people throw flowers. And they think me profusely now but still i question is looking out is that trust let me share. Mine because gold has always been a safe haven during times where nations are de globalized and where they dont trust each other and that is when people turn to gold and now people are bigger institutions and nations might be turning to big coin but on the individual level where there retell hers. And operates one thing you see over and over and you saw that with you see it with Elizabeth Warren and what they do is they mention that its a rigged system. And gold are ways to escape that rigging the manipulation and system rigged towards a particular participant in that syst
A segment with invesco chief Global Market strategist Christina Hooper is the ultimate safe haven trade she says that might not be too far fetched well certainly there are a lot of safe haven trades and ive heard some strategists argue in fact that bitcoin is a safe haven trade or perhaps an indicator that were very close. I think that might be a sign of fears about recession but but certainly it makes sense in this environment that we see investors looking for safe havens but i do think its a mistake with the fed signaling its willingness to be a lot more dovish right well the main idea of decline is safe haven 1st talked about on this show few years ago as being the ultimate safe haven better than gold to be a safe haven and that a lot of money moving into big going was the result of safe haven funds risk off money when the risk in stocks of bonds gets too high theres a risk. Off feeling in the markets and institutional money starts looking for safe havens becomes a safe haven this t