Yes. Our experience is substantially lower than that. Exactly, bryan. When we are looking at Asset Allocation longterm particularly for plans that dont have as mat tour portfolio as you do. You run an efficient frontty which is a mathematical calculation of determining the best mix of assets at each level of risk, the optimum returning portfolio. If you assume that private equity volatility was significantly lower than public markets, you would put your money in private equity. From a long term projection standpoint, we put in what is a economic risk. Now the reality if you said what do i think your portfolio will actually do, you dont experience economic volatility in private equity through time because you have valuation processes as we have seen that are lagged and reduce that volatility. We have a separate volatility forecast. This is economic volatility. We have a separate set of volatility numbers to represent accounting volatility so the forecast for your portfolio would look mo
Which is a mathematical calculation of determining the best mix of assets at each level of risk, the optimum returning portfolio. If you assume that private equity volatility was significantly lower than public markets, you would put your money in private equity. From a long term projection standpoint, we put in what is a economic risk. Now the reality if you said what do i think your portfolio will actually do, you dont experience economic volatility in private equity through time because you have valuation processes as we have seen that are lagged and reduce that volatility. We have a separate volatility forecast. This is economic volatility. We have a separate set of volatility numbers to represent accounting volatility so the forecast for your portfolio would look more like what you think in reality. From planning perspective we assign higher volatility. Accounting may undo that as you experience it in your portfolio. These numbers that you see on page 10, 1930 and 45, often time t
Natural resources as the benchmark. This is he more private investments and the risk is about twice as high. It is in line with private equity buyouts. I should have mentioned the higher returns and if we were rationale you dont get higher returns without seeing higher risk. The volatility numbers are higher. There is an improved sharp ratio reflected in the actions put together. A question. One of the things i struggle with with volatility and private equity, it is quite high. Yes. Our experience is substantially lower than that. Exactly, bryan. When we are looking at Asset Allocation longterm particularly for plans that dont have as mat tour portfolio as you do. You run an efficient frontty which is a mathematical calculation of determining the best mix of assets at each level of risk, the optimum returning portfolio. If you assume that private equity volatility was significantly lower than public markets, you would put your money in private equity. From a long term projection standp
Yes. Our experience is substantially lower than that. Exactly, bryan. When we are looking at Asset Allocation longterm particularly for plans that dont have as mat tour portfolio as you do. You run an efficient frontty which is a mathematical calculation of determining the best mix of assets at each level of risk, the optimum returning portfolio. If you assume that private equity volatility was significantly lower than public markets, you would put your money in private equity. From a long term projection standpoint, we put in what is a economic risk. Now the reality if you said what do i think your portfolio will actually do, you dont experience economic volatility in private equity through time because you have valuation processes as we have seen that are lagged and reduce that volatility. We have a separate volatility forecast. This is economic volatility. We have a separate set of volatility numbers to represent accounting volatility so the forecast for your portfolio would look mo
Thank you very much. Any questions, colleagues . A few years ago, we were talking, at least some of the supervisors were mentioning rebuilding your system. The open source . Yeah, what happened to that . That is ongoing. Right now it is more in a technical phase of development, so the technology is leading that project at the moment. The next step will occur in the third week in july, second week in july, when d. T. Will host a Stakeholder Community event to start gathering the specifications and also to create working groups around the development of certain aspects of the system. The next step is next july at the state level. There is bill 1784, which would provide matching funds to the city to develop a Voting System. The bill would allocate 60 million to Voting System development, anyone county would be eligible to receive no more than 8 million. Potentially, we would add meat 8 million in matching funds. The bill went through assembly, and it went through his First Reading at the