With with volatility and private equity, it is quite high. Yes. Our experience is substantially lower than that. Exactly, bryan. When we are looking at Asset Allocation longterm particularly for plans that dont have as mat tour portfolio as you do. You run an efficient frontty which is a mathematical calculation of determining the best mix of assets at each level of risk, the optimum returning portfolio. If you assume that private equity volatility was significantly lower than public markets, you would put your money in private equity. From a long term projection standpoint, we put in what is a economic risk. Now the reality if you said what do i think your portfolio will actually do, you dont experience economic volatility in private equity through time because you have valuation processes as we have seen that are lagged and reduce that volatility. We have a separate volatility forecast. This is economic volatility. We have a separate set of volatility numbers to represent accounting
Primary being back in the calendar from june to march, we are probably running to elections simultaneously. That will impact planning. September is the beginning of the filing period for the march election and the Charter Amendments going into the next fiscal year, the numbers dont drop for staffing is much as you would expect, and the reason is that it is a president ial general election, and we have had a string of very high turnout elections in San Francisco, and in 2016, that was the highest number of voters in the citys history, and i think 2020 will be the biggest election in the citys history. Again, we look at our different factors, look at our processes and just consider how many people we need to bring in. These are permanent, fulltime positions. No. Okay. They are all all the ones that are in my presentation are temp as needed. They are not people. Im looking at the budget, you went from 49 to 76. Okay. That is different. If you look back in time going forward, one we do the
Discussed why as again as usual, the recallers are using very little fact in their attacks. Specifically, as we agree and about this incident involving force, we know that the choice, whether or not to file charges, was made not, made by suzie inaudible and this was an event that took place before mr. Rowdean was even in an office. As usual, theres very little basis for fact and these attacks and that is being used to malign mr. Rowdean and the job he is doing. Weve seen this superior judge weighed in on this and examined this evidence and recognized that if theres no bearing to the case whatsoever, until i view this as an attempt to get out of traditional oversight vital for our city to restore fate and the police. The police chief to reconsider his letter and allow outside oversight to this is to the surveillance stuff as well as this letter. In both cases, what weve seen is an unwillingness to accept outside methods of control and outside methods of feedback so, people are clearly s
Discussed why as again as usual, the recallers are using very little fact in their attacks. Specifically, as we agree and about this incident involving force, we know that the choice, whether or not to file charges, was made not, made by suzie inaudible and this was an event that took place before mr. Rowdean was even in an office. As usual, theres very little basis for fact and these attacks and that is being used to malign mr. Rowdean and the job he is doing. Weve seen this superior judge weighed in on this and examined this evidence and recognized that if theres no bearing to the case whatsoever, until i view this as an attempt to get out of traditional oversight vital for our city to restore fate and the police. The police chief to reconsider his letter and allow outside oversight to this is to the surveillance stuff as well as this letter. In both cases, what weve seen is an unwillingness to accept outside methods of control and outside methods of feedback so, people are clearly s
Discussed why as again as usual, the recallers are using very little fact in their attacks. Specifically, as we agree and about this incident involving force, we know that the choice, whether or not to file charges, was made not, made by suzie inaudible and this was an event that took place before mr. Rowdean was even in an office. As usual, theres very little basis for fact and these attacks and that is being used to malign mr. Rowdean and the job he is doing. Weve seen this superior judge weighed in on this and examined this evidence and recognized that if theres no bearing to the case whatsoever, until i view this as an attempt to get out of traditional oversight vital for our city to restore fate and the police. The police chief to reconsider his letter and allow outside oversight to this is to the surveillance stuff as well as this letter. In both cases, what weve seen is an unwillingness to accept outside methods of control and outside methods of feedback so, people are clearly s