a discussion with students wherever she goes so she really appreciates those opportunities to hear unfiltered comments from young people and what their ideas about the future. course she doesn t have children but she. he comes across as naughty as mother referred to here in germany the connotation here of course being that mom will take care of everything everything s fine you don t have to think about the crises of the present and the future but also when she s around young people even if she s had a really stressful day she gets very interested and is interested to hear what they talk about most recently i was with her in africa and they re also in. one of the poorest countries in africa and she s always interested to hear that she visited a project a celta for women and she s interested to hear the nitty gritty kind of things that that move people and that concern people to then divide ways of how to feed that into big politics and that is also something where she will then make the
that danger? it s certainly an odd comment. i think we can probably break that down in a lot of ways. is he channeling his inner rudy? would you say that about a friend of yours? no close friend. nobody knows whether the southern district or any office for that matter is actually thinking of charging or has charges they can bring against the president. what we do know if there are charges that the southern district could bring, they will not hesitate to bring them because of any sort of political concerns. that is an important point coming from someone who has the experience. thanks to each of you. much appreciated. coming up, new reporting on this factory that donald trump said would bring back jobs, but too good to be true. we can say the eighth wonder of the world. this is the eighth wonder of the world. everyone is talking aoc and starbucks. i ve got a live interview with a seattle investor who has gone
thing to say. many people say it absolutely wasn t. and, of course, we have to question the president s judgment here in commenting on the trial and saying that, not ruling out a pardon. while the jury is deliberating. the idea the jury was not sequestered is fascinating in light of the judge s odd comment yesterday he did not realize how much attention this trial would get. that was a very bizarre comment that took a lot of people by surprise. because, of course, this is an extremely high-profile man. he worked for the trump campaign. the judge should have known this was going to draw a lot of media scrutiny. i think there s a lot to be said about whether or not paul manafort has been expecting a pardon and whether or not he s embracing now the president s support. any potential signaling, katie? even thinking back to what we played earlier. my colleague peter alexander shouting at the president, asking if he s considering a pardon. president says, i m not going to talk about that a
so i think he will continue on his path unabated and determine what if any extent there were any laws violated and submit a report to congress or charge one or month individuals over and above those who have already been charged. above the four which is a lot already. you can feel the heat a little bit even though it is winter. thanks for being on our power panel. coming up, donald trump s odd comment today about a potential pardon for mike flynn. i don t want to talk about pardons for michael flynn yet. we ll see what happens. a special legal report for you tonight on why that deal wouldn t be easy to break. and donald trump likes to bash the fbi on twitter. what did he do when he saw them today in person? and later, republicans making some large glams what corporation there s do if they get they tax cut. i have an exclusive interview
and i think this issue whether we ought to sit down, talk to the north koreans about nuclear weapons or the weather is not today s issue right now. so before this tillerson popping up his head about talks, no preconditions and then, of course, the sort of the mini walk-back today, we were sitting on this odd comment from lindsey graham, perhaps, a future replacement to tillerson at the state department, might be a 70% chance of some sort of military action against north korea the next time they test something. do you get the sense if the north koreans test another nuclear weapon our response is not going to be diplomatic? i do not get that sense, because the military response and an overt response of that kind, say a bombing strike of some kind, we would have to be informs the south koreans ahead of time, they d need to protect 20,000 south koreans.