taking trump down. today, he gets it. so will his campaign be more focused on the presidency or the former president. and the destruction of a major dam in southern ukraine floods the front lines. releasing millions of gallons of water and turning entire towns into lakes. as bad as it is, the worst may be yet to come. we ll have a live report from ukraine in just a minute. but we start with an intriging mystery surrounding the investigation into donald trump and his handling of classified documents. we re now learning that a second grand jury has been hard at work down in florida in addition to the one in d.c. according to the new york times, they already heard from one witness, with at least one more slated for later this week. but we don t know who the witnesses are, who the target might be or why that second grand jury was empanelled. and we ll still learning new details about the high stakes, highly unusual meeting between special counsel jack smith and trump s three
suspected prince harry s cross-examination should end by midday. but then his attorney wants the attorney to question him. so we know that there is at least one full day left of testimony from prince harry before this trial moves forward. back to you. meagan fitzgerald, thank you. and a lot to cover in our second hour of chris jansing reports. let s get right to it. at this hour, new urgency on capitol hill today to, quote, compel answers from the gop activist and billionaire harlen crow. and the case tied to the tragic death of a mother shot by her neighbor after a years long feud. and apple unveiling its vision of the future at the developers conference with a fresh round of skepticism over the question of just how much people are willing to shell out for their newest product. also indictment speculation, heating up tied to former president trump after his lawyers met with special counsel jack smith and other department of justice officials. trump sharing th
information and determined that this was a one piece of evidence that was not supported by any other information and that a trump-led department of justice chose to pass on the investigation and took it no further. now, what this ends up meaning is that you have two differing opinions here and it comes into question just how much oversight responsibility the oversight committee has in terms of the balance of powers. and comer strongly believes that he has the right to access that document and do whatever he wants with that document in terms of the congressional investigation into biden s ties to foreign business interests, while raskin believes that piece of information will be used as a political weapon designed to beat up president trump or president biden ahead of the 2024 election and won t glean any type of significant information. what this amounts to, though, is a very important confrontation that is going to happen in the oversight committee later this week, that you alluded to
there are certainly other tools that have more information and details about projects, the permitting dashboard, tools we have at our department of transportation website, that we certainly invite people to take a look at. what is exciting to me about invest.gov, this tool, it is the first time i ve seen in one view the ability to look at both the public sector projects that we re making possible with the infrastructure law or the american rescue plan or the inflation reduction act or some of the direct investments. and also the private investments that they re helping to unlock. if you look at the story of the extraordinary economic recovery post covid under this president s leadership, and the steps that are helping make sure that the 2020s unfold in a way that has america leading the world s economy, it is a story not just about those public sector investments that are so important, but about how they are unlocking the kind of private sector activity that helps to fuel the economy.
things. one is just how much proof that we have seen just over and over again, this is such an overwhelming case. two, as soon as jack smith feels like he has sufficient proof, he, i think, is going to feel that it is time to not as we used to say boil the ocean, meaning don t let the perfect be the enemy of the good, this is a case that should be brought, he will feel internal pressure to get this to trial and have the american public be able to see the evidence, and a jury to decide one way or the other so the electorate gets to know that information. and, finally, i do think that when you see defense making a presentation, an appeal, that is a sign of the very last stages of the case. so if you put that all together, i just don t see any reason that this would be delayed. where i could be wrong, i m given the most recent reporting,