donald j. trump back in 2015 but by people employed by him as security guards. and what their argument is although he was not present for the actual assault his rhetoric and his statements on the campaign trail and beyond essentially made it such that he would be able to almost say and give the green light to being able to assault somebody who was protesting. and so this is a case a little bit more tangentally related to a direct involvement by a former president of the united states or even a candidate donald trump. but i expect it would be in an observatory role in terms of him saying what he knew then, did he give the order? did he actually tell someone and instruct them to be violent? it ll probably a lot of times evolve around the first amendment and what he was to say. what did he know, what did he instruct and what did he actually see? phil, before we go i want to as it involves our breaking
donald j. trump back in 2015 but by people employed by him as security guards. and what their argument is although he was not present for the actual assault his rhetoric and his statements on the campaign trail and beyond essentially made it such that he would be able to almost say and give the green light to being able to assault somebody who was protesting. and so this is a case a little bit more tangentally related to a direct involvement by a former president of the united states or even a candidate donald trump. but i expect it would be in an observatory role in terms of him saying what he knew then, did he give the order? did he actually tell someone and instruct them to be violent? it ll probably a lot of times evolve around the first amendment and what he was to say. what did he know, what did he instruct and what did he actually see? phil, before we go i want to as it involves our breaking news laura, standby because you re still on camera. she s not hearing so we should p
debriefings. and i would be surprised if the really juicy material about pakistani taliban ties since 9/11, any of that information would be turned over to the agency. and in terms of these debriefings, the cia we understand may have some sort of observatory role in this, though not full access. what would be the protocol for handling this fellow? because we re getting some reports from taliban inside afghanistan that they re watching very closely as to you how baradar is being handled. and if he s treated well, they may be inclined to cooperation, but if he s not treated well, it will be stat it tuesday company. our relationship with pakistan has been one that has been up and down over the years. there have been times where they ve provided not just complete access, but turned the people over to us completely. i.e. the attacks in east africa, they captured key individuals and just gave gave them to us. there is a political dynamic with the taliban which is defendant because pakist