And newspaper reports of the early republic has been regarded by historians as a form of capitol dmen tear and not the least because theyre quite colorful. Men and women reported back home on what dolly wore, served, how she moved, and how she treated people. But, we have to look at these descriptions not just as mere celebrity mentions. The people who regarded dolly so minutely, whether members of the ruling elite or ordinary americans and europeans invested in the republican experiment, what they were looking for and how she looked and how she behaved, they were looking for signs and clues about the madisons themselves, maybe a specific political event, especially the declaration of war. And even for the fate of the republic. Some theres a lot at stake in these descriptions. After the American Revolution at a time of flux and change with very few real political structures in place. These new americans focussed on the persons of their leaders and the number one person they subjected t
Important target for the americans to get control of. After that they could then move on eastwards to quebec and maritimes. The campaigns in the regions west of montreal were made either in response to the need to devote more resources to local defense, particularly against hostile indians on the northwest frontier of the United States, or they are undertaken as preliminaries to advances on places of much greater strategic significance. The problem was that many of these failed and in their failures, they created new difficulties that required a different attention and resources before further advances could be made. The result was that the United States became bogged down in a series of small conflicts that did not develop according to any coherent strategy of how the larger war might be won. Now if thats the case, the problem with the american war effort was not so much an affective strategy as the inability to develop sufficient military power to surmount the other obstacles to exis
Industry which is common that, is career ending. Its going to be examined in a very detailed way. So the usual attack or feeling about our technology is actually the fda is extraordinarily conservative and resistant to allowing these sorts of things through. And, in fact, if i looked at the pressure that the pharmaceutical industry could bring to bear on the fda and sort of the heft of big pharma is far bigger than biotech like monsanto. It really surprises me that you think the fda is captured in the sense that it, you know, will allow junk science as you claim it to be to be the basis for regulatory approvals. And most of the people, those kinds of scientists that i referred to that, you know, they look at that stuff and they would have no problem at all saying its totally garbage because not everybody is captured by the monsantos in the world. Let me get a question in the center here. Get the boom over here. You brought references to high Blood Pressure and autism. I can draw the sa
Pray for forgiveness for everybody on earth which includes nonmuslims. 42 5. If allah wanted all the world tore muslims he would have made it such. You cannot compel mankind against their will to convert. Why cant we have these verses plastered on the twitter feeds or whenever they come up with like you can address the ideology, 9 of muslims are people and these guys have been isusing our religion and i dont understand why we cant get the funding. The verses. If youre harsh hearted, people will leave you, dont be severe. We need you and people like you. We need you and people like you in the United States government, right, to be able to lead that kind of a campaign. Youre exactly right. I dont disagree with what youre saying. Its not just an issue of funding. Its an issue of people and expertise and attracting those people. Isnt part of of the problem that the u. S. Government isnt equipped or constitutionally able to advocate anything in terms of religion. I think there are plenty of
To be true. Just a clarification. This idea talking points. One of the reasons why some of these things may occur as arguments again and again is that theyre actually right. Okay . There are many people that are saying these things. Theyre not using them as talking points. And this is a possibility to consider the same arguments are made generally with other groups there. Theyre well trodden paths. The second thing is i really think its a little disingeneralous to say you have nothing against genetically modified organism its they were tested enough. I heard the same thing with environmentalism and stuff. Actually, not you personally necessarily, but everything is being done to prevent the kinds of testing that you would require in order to certify that something is safe. It is absolutely impossible to prove that something is safe. You can show that you cant see any damage from it given the kinds of test thats are done. You cannot make that proof. In fact, whether field trials are ripp