the thugsjfi] and criminals areçócorrupting our justice system, xdhe s rallying his supporters as another legal probe, the special counsel criminal investigation intensifies.e1xdxdr i ll talk to trump s attorney joe tacopina and preet bharara. your platform should be banned. tiktok ceo faces bipartisan ( skepticism that the app may be used for spying by the chinese government. has indeed spied on americaná citizens? i don t think that spying is the right way to describ wit. can the biden adóilistration ban the most downloaded app on the planet?5a■xdw3lpe1lpe1ñri] fá and parental w3permission. as was, utah decidest( to target all of 5$%1■ media and becomes the first state in the nation to restrict how children use it.i] we have a responsibility to protect our young people. i ll talk to republi#pf governor spencer cox who signed this new law regardi consent for minors usq media apps. joining me for insight and e9 correspondent yamiche alcindor.1 jak
didn t read it in the clip, which, if that is, in fact the d case, when i mñr answering a hypothetical question without knowing the facts and i will respond how i think appropriate. now what i since learned is that there were no campaign funds used, that there was a legal invoice sent by a lawyer over the course of a year to cover these payments and more, and tze more importantly, that the campaign finance law is clear. bradley smith, former chairman of the fec, has come on and said clearly that there was no u campaign finance law involved here because his personal funds and the expevd9qui been made irrespective of the n■ campaign. those are facts i didn t have before me five years ago as a hypothetical question was posed to a legal expert on tv.i]i] all right. it sounds like you have a defense ready to go, but 5a■ probable. i mean, if you re a prosecutor, you re making these claims.çót( great.q show us your proof of it. it seems like there s enough at dispute here that actual
you call itt( personal funds. it is in a court of law it s been proven that it was trump organization funds.lpt( it was not funds related to the campaign. but he used a trump organization check. qrltr(t&háh% not cam#=kujzçó finance laws. chuck, that s personal.q that s personal. everw.$ing with the donald trump organization is personal? you realize the door you re opening there.jf chuck, cpáa-1juá q absolutely conflating issues and 2( they just don t. this is a case that s being investigated because allegedly donald trump had an obligation ] to notify the fec, the federal election committee, he did not.p the fec has come forth and said that. this has nothing to do whether he paid it through an organization, or his perso.w funds. these were personal funds, by t( all accounts these were personal funds and not campaign funds.e1 whether the trump organization, donald trump the person, fá mar-a-lago corporation, whatever it is.e1 they re personal and not campaign funds and t