comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Case of first impressi - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Transcripts For MSNBC Meet the Press 20240706

the thugsjfi] and criminals areçócorrupting our justice system, xdhe s rallying his supporters as another legal probe, the special counsel criminal investigation intensifies.e1xdxdr i ll talk to trump s attorney joe tacopina and preet bharara. your platform should be banned. tiktok ceo faces bipartisan ( skepticism that the app may be used for spying by the chinese government. has indeed spied on americaná citizens? i don t think that spying is the right way to describ wit. can the biden adóilistration ban the most downloaded app on the planet?5a■xdw3lpe1lpe1ñri] fá and parental w3permission. as was, utah decidest( to target all of 5$%1■ media and becomes the first state in the nation to restrict how children use it.i] we have a responsibility to protect our young people. i ll talk to republi#pf governor spencer cox who signed this new law regardi consent for minors usq media apps. joining me for insight and e9 correspondent yamiche alcindor.1 jak

Transcripts for MSNBC Meet the Press 20240604 08:10:00

if you look at the facts for a second, you have two crucial distinctions and one this was personal funds.i] can you imagine the amount of people that would be begging fo3 donald trump s sp if he used q expense? they would be going ballistic and they would have a right to be going ballistic. thee1 standard of law and th is important, if you used personalñi funds an you re involved in the campaigni the bright line test is would you have expended that money?lpk irrespective of the candidacy? irrespective of the campaign? is yes. this was the personal civil settlement that s done every day in new york city and it has xdt( nothing to do with campaign finance laws.qfá no, no, no. look, you may have your day in court to make this case, but you personal funds. p this was funds where he was q repaid by the trump organization.e1 no, incorrect.

Transcripts for MSNBC Meet the Press 20240604 08:22:00

office basically begging him to bring that case, he didn t do it. this is the mark of someone who3 is carefult( and deliberative, 1 we can have the argument about the merits and case, but you can t say about alvin bragg that he s rushing to the court to indict the president on flimsy charges. xd i m not asking yo@l=i political look, but as a former law enforcement official, look,k what the former president did, ho/■2ujvzu look at it if you re alvin bragg, if he brings the indictment, qjj$(ár g it down, he looks like he s been bullied.r in that sense, we re really e1t( seeing the law enforcement community get challenged here by the former president.çó how would you be handling this? i don t know. i m retired from that now by virtue are you sure?fá i m retired fo look, the only way you can handle these cases and you will get criticism whether you bring a case or don t bg a casee] you have to look the at the law and the facts. the evidence is as i said a q

Transcripts for MSNBC Meet the Press 20240604 08:20:00

court? i don t know. my former office chose not to bring the case, what was interesting in your exchange with tacopina and we ve had a melange of republicans saying no crime here.u nobody would ever charge this case. it s unseemly, it s irrationally, it s never happened before and it did, it happened with respect to michael cohen who was not only charged with this type of crime, thisñ@( particular crime.v it. his lawyer thought it was a crime and he thought it was a crime, pled guilty to it. his lawyer thought it was a crime and allowed him to pl>q% guilty to it. the judge accepted the guilty plea and thought it was a crime not it s appropriate to bring such a case and argue about the optics of it, but the idea that this is unprecedented is just false and wrong.ñiñri]jf you heard his case.u he feels as ifçó there s not and, look, thew3 campaign finan cases have not been easily prosecuted, and we know that. he brought the john edwards case.+■e1e1 i these arexd very diff

Transcripts for MSNBC Meet the Press 20240604 08:19:00

investigations against the former president where we ve seen major developments in the case. former trump officialsi] includb former chief of staffe1 mark meadows will beçói]fá compelled testify regarding january 6th. mi january 6th, is still in question. arguments heard this week. trump lost his attorney-client privilege, and his mar-a-lago documents case had to talk to ar grand jury on friday. and then there sq the case of ■ference in the state ofxd georgia where the das likely to decide soon whether to bring charges there.ok joining me now is the former u.sy/uj district of new york preet bharara.t+h#rom the southern i]d preet, welcome back. thanks for having me. let me start with what@ve just heard, mr. tacopina. at the end of the day would this be an easier case in federal

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.