he says to me, i didn t do anything wrong. but the world isn t that simple. the criminal justice system isn t as fair as you think. i hope that s true. and these guys aren t so darn far. i don t know about that. i think that this has been outwardly a very fair process to this point. i m not talking about mueller. i m talking about the spygate investigation. you had your guys go in there and they said there s nothing going on with spygate as you call it. they re not my guys. they re from the parties. one of them has been very helpful to the president. the other one is from your party. they re not my guys. if they let them see it, why didn t they let me see it? why didn t they let the president see it? ation.ause he s under why would rudy giuliani back in the day ever go to the people he s looking at and tell them i m looking at you couple you never did that. because the investigation is closed. it is now over with, over a year.
and i believe medicare must be empowered to negotiate the price of drugs. california values senator dianne feinstein breaking news tonight, a very serious new accusation against former trump campaign chair paul manafort. the special counsel, bob mueller, his office is accusing manafort of trying to tamper with potential witnesses while on pretrial release to influence their testimony. by doing so, mueller s team things manafort may have violated the conditions of his release. they re calling for a hearing to revise or revoke it. the special counsel wants to see him sent to jail. that brings in the lawmaker who has been following the russia probe every step of the way, democrat adam schiff. good to have you, sir. good to be with you.
the investigation is ongoing. we don t have what they have. you know that there is absolutely no dispositive proof that a president can t obstruct justice. in fact to the extent that we have had opinions, we have had supreme court findings, the opposite is the truth, that is common sense, not just law. no man is above law, including the president. chris, i didn t write the letter. i agree with about 70 to 80% of it. i disagree with two major parts of it. i don t think you get to the issue, the constitutional issue of whether you can subpoena a president, because there is an olc ruling that binds mueller. because mueller doesn t exist other than as a creature of the. he has no power, like he might have indicted manafort incorrectly, we ll have to find out. did he have proper authority? if he issued a subpoena, it would be immediately dismissed
publicly ty cob should be fired. he gave the president i thought terrible advice. i think lied to the president consistently about the nature of this investigation and the timing of it. and giving overall dockage. unlike all the presidents that sat with every other president we went and give a million pages of documents and allowed the white house counsel, the chief strategist to be to expedite this which i thought was not wise. okay. okay but here i said cob should be fired and i also said i was a guy supporting rosenstein i was there when sessions brought him up as the guy for it that he should be terminated. and here is why. not mueller but rosenstein. and here is what i think you really the focus ought to be is that the president of the ups is the chief law enforcement officer of the country. he ought to order rosenstein to do what deafen nunes did and release every document
so what this puzzle piece is and how it fits into the larger f z puzzle that he s put together we don t know. charlie, we booked you to talk about the article that you wrote. we only have one question for that. right now, congressional candidate s not mueller could decide trump s future. what do we know on whether or not mueller could basically indict a sitting president? so, now, rudy giuliani acting as trump s outside lawyer has claimed, whatever his credibility is put in under that, that mueller s team has informed them that mueller will adhere to the justice department s interpretation of the constitution. but sitting presidents are immune from indictment. if that s right, that means mueller will not be indicting trump while in office. he could still face legal jeopardy if he is impeached or