the investigation is ongoing. we don't have what they have. you know that there is absolutely no dispositive proof that a president can't obstruct justice. in fact to the extent that we have had opinions, we have had supreme court findings, the opposite is the truth, that is common sense, not just law. no man is above law, including the president. >> chris, i didn't write the letter. i agree with about 70 to 80% of it. i disagree with two major parts of it. i don't think you get to the issue, the constitutional issue of whether you can subpoena a president, because there is an olc ruling that binds mueller. because mueller doesn't exist other than as a creature of the. he has no power, like he might have indicted manafort incorrectly, we'll have to find out. did he have proper authority? if he issued a subpoena, it would be immediately dismissed