I. R. P. , before we start looking at what we might like to do. You know, if we take over pg es infrastructure, clean power s. F. Wont even exist. So all of the stuff theyre doing will be for naught. We as the city, including s. F. P. U. C. , but external of silos, like clean power s. F. , we need to be looking at what we want to get to. [buzzer] and how all of the cylinders of the city can work to get there. That will be the same whether it is clean power s. F. , whether it is public power. I think it is time to break out from letting one part of the City Government to sit on this issue, which has been happening for six, seven, eight years. We need to have this happen at the 30,000foot view. Im hoping that the [buzzer] chairwoman thank you very much. Any other Public Comment . Seeing none, the Public Comment is now closed. Mr. Clerk, can you please call item number seven. Item seven is Public Comment. Chairwoman any members of the public like to make comment . Seeing none, Public Comm
Rest of the presentation to susanne, and were happy to take questions when she is done. Chairwoman if you dont mind, lets see if we have any questions about this portion. Sure. Chairwoman commissioner singh . Yeah, i have a quick one. I was wondering is it possible for disclosing businesses are there businesses who are willing to disclose theyre participating in the super green program, to maybe promote in their physical locations, if they have any . That theyre a participant . Yes. In fact, all of them do that. Oh, they do . Yes. I think that has been a motivator for them, too. I think they see in many cases our values are very aligned, in terms of our mission, and they want to promote to their costumers that theyre participating. Great. So we have decals and other things we do. Weve been doing sort of events with some of those costumers as well. Great. That was my only question. Chairwoman thanks. Commissioner mar . Thanks for the great presentation and all of the great work over the
They were involved in capital planning, they also told us we needed to delay our discussion of local integrative buildout that wed been talking about before i got involved in 2013, until that was done. Those were done. It didnt happen. And were now on the next cycle of those. And i can only imagine that were going to hear folks wanting to wait for the first s. F. P. U. C. Plan, and for them to put out their getting to 2030 i. R. P. , before we start looking at what we might like to do. You know, if we take over pg es infrastructure, clean power s. F. Wont even exist. So all of the stuff theyre doing will be for naught. We as the city, including s. F. P. U. C. , but external of silos, like clean power s. F. , we need to be looking at what we want to get to. [buzzer] and how all of the cylinders of the city can work to get there. That will be the same whether it is clean power s. F. , whether it is public power. I think it is time to break out from letting one part of the City Government
Cycle of those. And i can only imagine that were going to hear folks wanting to wait for the first s. F. P. U. C. Plan, and for them to put out their getting to 2030 i. R. P. , before we start looking at what we might like to do. You know, if we take over pg es infrastructure, clean power s. F. Wont even exist. So all of the stuff theyre doing will be for naught. We as the city, including s. F. P. U. C. , but external of silos, like clean power s. F. , we need to be looking at what we want to get to. [buzzer] and how all of the cylinders of the city can work to get there. That will be the same whether it is clean power s. F. , whether it is public power. I think it is time to break out from letting one part of the City Government to sit on this issue, which has been happening for six, seven, eight years. We need to have this happen at the 30,000foot view. Im hoping that the [buzzer] chairwoman thank you very much. Any other Public Comment . Seeing none, the Public Comment is now closed
Second thing going on, which is we are taxing a mode of transportation that is shown to create congestion and using that money to fund modes of transportation that could reduce transportation. There is an economic benefit. Unfortunately, the first of phnom economic impact, with the data to analyse, and the second we dont. When i say, as we conclude in the report, that this is a mildly negative economic impact. That is a result of placing the tax on the consumers and spending the money at the city. It is a fairly small impact of 25 milliondollar reduction to the g. D. P. , which is less then the tax that is raised. We are not able, because of Data Limitations to estimate how responsive t. N. C. Ridership would be to be an increase in fares, although we expected to decline somewhat. The only kind of caveat that we mentioned in our report is about the proposed tax and it also includes Autonomous Vehicles. At present, there are no Autonomous Vehicles doing rides in San Francisco. The case