only from the standpoint that giselle believed it was michelle s fault. so, in terms of responding to that question, the abc has to be yes, there s truth to it. from her perspective. from giselle s perspective. she had to blame somebody. this is a very disturbed vinl. yes, there s no question about that. from my perspective, dealing with, in particular murders, my position is they are all screwed up. the normal person doesn t react that way. we have to believe that, right? right. the normal person does not behave that way. when a person commits a murder, there s something loose in their head, there has to be. they know most about the parameters of human nature. he helped raise eight younger siblings, growing up in south central l.a., worked through law school and now is a prosecutor, seeks out sound advice from someone who has seen it all, his
spy. so one of the first things we requested was physical surveillance on her. we had a lot to do. the fbi put cameras in her cubicle and microphones and tapped her phones and all that sort of thing. we started doing significant physical surveillance on montes, identifying her patterns of behavior, what was her routine. so watching ana montes, we saw that, for example, she would leave her home on sunday night at a precise time, go to the local metro, get on, go several stops, get off, walk, stop at locations, wait 60 seconds, go somewhere else, wait 90 seconds, more methodical, things a normal person doesn t. you knew something was afoot. when her shoe seemingly untied and she stopped, was she
give three things in this that you think you pull out and say this was radical thinking at the time and is still radical thinking because nobody is teaching it. in terms of freedom versus the planned society. he has the whole chapter called why the worst get on top. we systems like these that promise to plan everything down to the last detail for you attract demogogues and worse. why? they are based on making promises that can t in the long run be fulfill. like healthcare will actually save us money. exactly. or what we had in the united states where we have $100 trillion of unfunded likes in terms of social security and medicare for the future which makes river household of four in the hoc another $1.3 million. we have the age of the negative millionaire we have now entered. a normal person doesn t make promises like that. a normal person thinks about the future.
give three things in this that you think you pull out and say this was radical thinking at the time and is still radical thinking because nobody is teaching it. in terms of freedom versus the planned society. he has the whole chapter called why the worst get on top. we systems like these that promise to plan everything down to the last detail for you attract demogogues and worse. why? they are based on making promises that can t in the long run be fulfill. like healthcare will actually save us money. exactly. or what we had in the united states where we have $100 trillion of unfunded likes in terms of social security and medicare for the future which makes river household of four in the hoc another $1.3 million. we have the age of the negative millionaire we have now entered. a normal person doesn t make promises like that. a normal person thinks about the future.