a murder case. it was the priest who called the police. talked to frazier richey and told him about a story with an odd encounter with a woman came to him seeking solace. outside an office in a patio area. he asked her do you want to go into confession? she said no. that s why he was able to talk to us about. she was wearing a medical-type scrubs, same physical build and characteristics of giselle. she was asking for forgiveness for something she had not yet done. wait a minute, she asked for forgiveness for a sin not committed? that s the interpretation the priest got. that was 3:00 in the afternoon, the day michelle went missing. richey was convinced giselle killed michelle le, but they didn t know how she did it or
when she did it or where she did it or, more important, what she did with the body. if you don t have a body, it makes the case more difficult. richey and the other investigators continued the tedious work of building a murder case without a body, ran fingerprints, sent information out for testing. they tested a strand of hair found in michelle s car. it turned out to be giselle s. some of her touched dna on the turn signal, too. since they knew each other, it wasn t enough to make an arrest. they checked giselle s cell phone records, found her phone, like michelle s left a trail in the hours after michelle vanished. what do you know? the location michelle s phone went, giselle s phone went. as if they were traveling together? yes. the ease dropping of
high school friend, giselle. how long has she been missing? [ inaudible ] i have no idea since when? almost a week now. i told her to stay away from my daughter. so, clearly there was animosity between giselle and michelle. they brought giselle down to the police station for a more in-depth conversation. i understand, at one point you and michelle were close friends, right? considered her my sister. then, what happened? she made a mistake. scott made a mistake. and that was that when you were with scott or had you broken up? no, we were still together. they made the mistake twice. then she told a strange
he goes inside. giselle is inside his house, inside his room tampering with his computer. sound familiar? it was the same thing she was doing at the nursing school. when was this before the murder? the tuesday. there s something else. a piece of evidence you have to see to believe. before the disappearance, giselle threatened him, so alarming he recorded them on his iphone, in case something bad ever happened. this one, in scott s car. their small daughter, sitting in the backseat, listening. you listen closely. you are about to hear the realoreal giselle. that s not what you said at all. fine. starting from now, we are going to be honest about michelle. do you understand me? whether you sleep with her, share food with her, whether you
only from the standpoint that giselle believed it was michelle s fault. so, in terms of responding to that question, the abc has to be yes, there s truth to it. from her perspective. from giselle s perspective. she had to blame somebody. this is a very disturbed vinl. yes, there s no question about that. from my perspective, dealing with, in particular murders, my position is they are all screwed up. the normal person doesn t react that way. we have to believe that, right? right. the normal person does not behave that way. when a person commits a murder, there s something loose in their head, there has to be. they know most about the parameters of human nature. he helped raise eight younger siblings, growing up in south central l.a., worked through law school and now is a prosecutor, seeks out sound advice from someone who has seen it all, his