remotest sense. you re talking about powerful men taking advantage of their power in grow tess being and awful ways. yeah. that being said, they re both pretty sceevy guys and i would rather public liech be rid of them. i want to point out to the audience, the team and i when we looked at the story this morning. that whole nonconsensual sexual relations thing, we reached out to the new york times. this was the language that came out of the settlement and that they actually took the language that was in the story from the settle itself s. they re relying on that. 21st century fox which had knowledge of the draft lawsuit used that language to describe the specific allegation sz in written responses to the times. this is fox putting forward that language of a nonconsensual sexual relationship. interesting development. e.j., you know, we talk about this idea that there are all of these powerful men being accused
the moving of the priest. every day every scab you pick at there is more problems. bill o reilly was promoting his book on fox news a month ago. he tweeted out this morning my investigative team has done a superb job in expiecing the liegs and the smears. i will speak with you on monday. i ll speak with you on monday. that could be fox. he s still welcome to go on fox. yeah. i mean, i agree that, you know, the $32 million, that s not coming out from change they found in the cell phone, okay? that s covering up something fairly serious, and i think that, you know, that lovely phrase, a nonconsensual sexual relationship probably holds the key to why it s $32 million. the other thing, joy, that the only thing that i can see that joins the weinstein and o reilly stories is power. that these are power relationships, these are not sexual relationships in the
his camp has issued a statement saying, any allegations of nonconsensual sex are unequivocally denied by mr. weinstein. joining me right now to discuss, criminal defense attorney richard herman. so we know, investigators in new york and london are looking into two of the cases. so richard, could any of these investigations lead to criminal charges? well, they could, because any nonconsensual touching is a crime, it s simple. it can t be any simpler than that. and why the attorney in 2013 did not prosecute, when they had corroboration, they had a tape where weinstein admitted it, that raises so many spectors of issues, he took a $100,000 campaign donation, just horrible. it s easy to sit back and say, they should prosecute him, these
similar accusations. the new yorker publishing a story alleging weinstein raped three women. that s a story his spokeswoman rejektded. any allegations of nonconsensual mr. wweinstein.ocally denied by as further confirmed there were never any acts of retaliation to women who refused his advances. mr. weinstein believed all of these relationships were consensual. cnn is reaching out for clarification on each specific allegation. the new yorker also posted audio from a sting operation from 2015. in it a young model resists and refers to a previous incident where she says he groped her. the audio is rather disturbing.
in just a few hours demonstrators are planning to march in new york to shed light on a worsening type of sexual abuse. we re talking about revenge porn here. in case you re not familiar, the exact definition is when nonconsensual pornography is distributed online to shame, exploit or extort its victims. there are at least two high profile cases of revenge porn right now. the military investigating the sharing of sexually explicit images of female troops, and in texas an 18-year-old high school senior committed suicide. she was harassed online for months when intimate photos of her surfaced online twochlt people have been charged in that case. well, leah juliet, the organizer of the march against revenge porn later today is with us. she was a victim of revenge porn herself as a teenager. also sara o brien, cnn money reporter. leah, thank you so much to both of you for being here, but leah, i would like to start with you.