Not doing that. It is important to start the discussion about creating tools of measuring our Affordable Housing and creating tools to enforce that. I grew up in new york city, one to my parents who had immigrated here to the u. S. Actually, i started really becoming active in working with the community when i was in high school. Came out to california for college, went to stanford. I was always politically involved. When i was a college student, i worked on the initiative to get rid of affirmative action in our public government system. Currently we have 3 legislative items that are pending. The first is going to be coming to a final vote on tuesday, our midmarket uptown Tenderloin Task exemption legislation. It is basically an incentive to encourage businesses to come to midmarket. In particular where we have the highest commercial vacancy. And then when i graduated moved out to San Francisco about 12 years ago. I always loved Sanford Cisco in college, and i just wanted to try it out
My colleagues would see fit to work with the executive director to meet with the budget analyst and meet with the mayors people and i know the dance. I have done it for many years, and i think to do that in regard to getting things like a secretary. We need a secretary. I dont think the next executive director whoever it is should be sitting up here in the middle with us. For one thing that makes that person a target for the public. Oh hes running the place. Whoever the executive director is he should be down there with the staff and a secretary at the end of this table as we had as i recall when i was on the Police Commission carries out all sorts of good functions and briefing us as a commission and at the same time isnt subject to the kind of pressures that the executive director is in terms of well, if i say this will they think im not doing my job right or should i keep this under the table . Those are just the realities of the dynamics between us as a commission and our executive
Good morning, and welcome to the San Francisco county Transportation Authority meeting for today, tuesday, april 25th, 2017 i am the chair of the ta, aaron peskin. And mr. Clerk, could you call the roll . Breed . Present. Cohen . Present. Farrell . Absent. Fewer . Absent. Kim. Absent. Peskin. Present. Rohnen. Absent, safahir. Tang, present. Yee, is absent. We have a quorum, commissioner would like to make a motion to excuse commissioners farrell, ronen yee and fewer. Motion made by commissioner safahi, is there a second for that seconded by breed. Without objection this has been a big month, with the passage, that will provide, 52 million for the road transit and biking and walking facilities through a combination of gas, and diesel fuel, taxes and the vehicle fee increase, and truck weight restoration and we join with the cities and counties up and down the state for thanking the senator, and assembly man, phraser from the Transportation Committees in the legislature as well as Govern
Would like again to thank you all for sharing your stories and insights. The commission absolutes all of you and the work that you do to care for the very broad and diverse immigrant community we have in San Francisco. We also thank the staff at the office of Civic Engagement and immigrant affairs for tonights hearing and sfgov tv and office of city administrator for its support. The immigrant Rights Commission is now adjourned. [meeting adjourned] were here to raise awareness and money and fork for a good accuse. We have this incredible gift probably the widest range of restaurant and count ii destines in any district in the city right here in the mission intricate why dont we capture that to support the mission youths going to college thats for the food for thought. We didnt have a signature font for our orientation thats a 40yearold organization. Mission graduates have helped me to develop special as an individual theyve helped me figure out and provide the tools for me that i need
Mr. White is it necessary for us to go through them again. The audio the Deputy Director recorded the first 3 items not necessary okay turning to oh, no, i have to call any comment on the minutes and i will hearing none, call the question again. All in favor, say i. I. Any opposition hearing none, the minutes as amended by commissioner kopp and myself are approved turning to item number 4 is a discussion and possible action to approve Ethics Commission regular meeting of for calendar 2017 this is a new procedure of that the executive director has suggested to give rather than giving the notices once a month giving the Public Awareness of agreed dates assuming at dates on the calendar suggest in the attachment so one can plan over the 12month period. Any discussion. No as you point out commissioner keane not a requirement but keeping on the policy agenda as well as trying to enhance engagement the public ass are dates that conform with the requirement in the by laws and accepting over t