intimately you are involved in the ceremony itself, you can say that is an undo burden on my conscience. or how about this should i be forced to do a gay wedding? would you? no i wouldn t. i think the distinction though is there s a la terj kal component and then there s this commercial side where we ve slipped into talking about bakeries and pizzerias. and flowers. and flowers. and some are necessities and some are issues of convenience. with all due respect the constitution does not talk about litter la ter ji. talking about passing a law that would keep us from exercising our religious freedom. sure. that s not just litergy. free exercise thereof. we re talking about people s deeply held religious
and it s hard not to see it as an end run. look at jeb bush. he sent in the work emails your personal emails should be personal. the problem in politics is stories. there s a story that clintons think that the law doesn t apply to them or they can be better than the law. this plays directly into that. why does she not have to have transparent emails until they finally ask when she s out of the state department. i was shocked to read in an article today, the house investigating benghazi that s been asking about her emails about the benghazi attacks for two and a half years, just got 300 last month. she s stalling. even despite this even when they re asking it s a employ request. it s hard to say it s not intentional. it s not a good day for hillary. it s going to bring benghazi back. they re full of it. this proves that there was intentional disclosure. would you go that far? no i wouldn t. i think feeding the benghazi beast
commitment. the man is saying i am ready to make that commitment on you. if i were to buy you, greg, a car that you had to drive around for the rest of your life, would you be satisfied with a camry? no i wouldn t. that s a good point. wow. that would be cool if you tried to put a camry on my finger though. i don t know, tom. that was a good point, comparing something useful to something that has no use at all. good point. vow saying the ring has no use. it has no use, but i agree. you have to get out there and it is good. it makes a guy think okay i really want to do this. i will blow all of this money on an absolutely useless thing. it is better that it is useless. useless? no, no, no. girls can use it to rub in their friends faces. my ring is bigger than yours and isn t that what it is all about? i understand.
commitment. the man is saying i am ready to make that commitment on you. if i were to buy you, greg, a car that you had to drive around for the rest of your life, would you be satisfied with a camry? no i wouldn t. that s a good point. wow. that would be cool if you tried to put a camry on my finger though. i don t know, tom. that was a good point, comparing something useful to something that has no use at all. good point. vow saying the ring has no use. it has no use, but i agree. you have to get out there and it is good. it makes a guy think okay i really want to do this. i will blow all of this money on an absolutely useless thing. it is better that it is useless. useless? no, no, no. girls can use it to rub in their friends faces. my ring is bigger than yours and isn t that what it is all about? i understand.
and recommended further analysis. in 2013, the level of testing we have now is so further advanced than we ever had. would you be opposed to further testing? no i wouldn t. it would be interesting to see what the findings are. not just the skin by the muscle tissue on the slide. nose fragments of tissue can yield very useful dna. they found small black particles that may be ammunition residue. why not complete that testing in. i agree with what you say. a lot can be learned. i don t think anybody that can be learned will satisfy all the different theories. congress passed a jfk act in 1992 so americans could have access to some five million government pages. it also requires all assassination records to go