when in 1992 when the jfk act was passed, a huge part of that was ultimately the film of the making it available to the american people but that didn t resolve in the public mind what happened to the president. and somehow there is this way in which no matter what is released and it s important to be released. i m not against that. but it seems that it people see in these documents or people see in this film what they already believe. there was a fascinating poll, i m sure you saw it, that 56% of americans believe that more than one person somebody besides lee harvey oswald was involved in the assassination. also interesting, only white college graduates believe that just one person a lone person lee harvey oswald was the shooter and large majority of both, clinton and trump voters believe there were other people involved. so geb again here we are nearly
people are likely to be disappointed. this is the group set for the jfk act signed 25 years ago. a very sober, smart, nonpartisan group of people looked at the materials in the 90s and forced out materials they felt were relevant to letting will us make up our minds about lee harvey oswald. that came out in 1998. what didn t come out were colors that were related and the intelligence said we don t think they should be released because of the harm it might pose to national security and they said they are not necessary to understand the lee harvey oswald story. what s interesting today and it s the irony. y have someone who doesn t think much of the community. they have a base that is
created by the 1992 jfk act. that was passed unanimously by congress in the wake of the oliver stone film. and they were responsible for releasing all of the jfk assassination records. i m sorry, i just i appreciate the evidence you have got, but i don t yet see the motivation that you re saying that the mafia would have to kill the president and where does lee harvey oswald enter this picture? two good points there. john and robert kennedy waged the largest war on organized crime. that s how jfk came to prominence as a senator is going after the organized crime and dragging these mob bosses that liked to stay in the shadows like carlos marcelo into the light in front of the cameras where his brother, bobby, the counsel could grill them. once jfk became president, he kept his word. they mounted a huge war against
and recommended further analysis. in 2013, the level of testing we have now is so further advanced than we ever had. would you be opposed to further testing? no i wouldn t. it would be interesting to see what the findings are. not just the skin by the muscle tissue on the slide. nose fragments of tissue can yield very useful dna. they found small black particles that may be ammunition residue. why not complete that testing in. i agree with what you say. a lot can be learned. i don t think anybody that can be learned will satisfy all the different theories. congress passed a jfk act in 1992 so americans could have access to some five million government pages. it also requires all assassination records to go
fragment and recommended further analysis. in 2013, the level of testing we have now is so further advanced that we have ever had, would you be opposed to further testing? no i would not be opposed to further testing at all. it would be interesting to see what the findings are, not just the skin, but also the muscle tissue on the slide. those fragments of tissue can yield dna. they found small black particles that they suggested was ammunition residue, but they made no effort to confirm that. why not complete that testing? i agree with what you say, a lot can be learned. i don t think anything that s going to be learned is going to satisfy all the different conspiracy theorists. congress passed the jfk act in 1992 so americans could have access to some 5 million government pages. it also requires all asass