it s hard to imagine why this would be better than many of the attempts the last decade on many of these issues. daca itself is a work-around. it is an attempt to make some unintended consequences of our immigration policy rational, humane and fair. the childishness, the tweets, it is hard to imagine that they re going to get this done by february. i m confused. is it shutdown schumer or crying chuck? i think you have to pick one nickname and stick with it. russian bots. why did chuck schumer offer to pay for the wall? that was the confusing part? some other negotiation. it makes more sense that he is back to his original position, isn t it? it was trying to get something done to shut down the shutdown. errol is using words i don t
the wall or something else. or for changing legal migration and other things. shouldn t get any credit for having compassion to the d.r.e.a.m.ers because he doesn t. if you cared, you would help them, period and then work on the flawed system. it is is hard to see how far they might be able to go. gutierrez says build the wall. just save our d.r.e.a.m.ers. building a wall amounts to a couple billions a year for ten years to enact a policy that many democrats feel is never going to work anyway, it might be big win for trumpville, for the campaign. if he said he got the wall, it s a big deal. again, at some point you have to start governing and think about the national interest. if any deal gets done, elements on both sides will be angry. that s how you know a real deal got down.
they re not getting anything back for it. if you have ever read chester l.karis, if somebody offers something once, they will offer it again. we know this bill of love stuff from the president is just talk. how do we know? listen to what mick mulvaney, the budget director, said on this show. just say what his position is on it. how do they get to stay? who gets to stay? again, depends on what we get in exchange. what do we get for border security? what do we get for wall? love has no strings attached. are we going corinthians here? only at weddings do you hear that. it turns out love is a pretty goodbar beganing chip. they like the idea because it is popular. 90 something percent of the public wants to see some kind of decent resolution for the d.r.e.a.m.ers. well, fine. he wants to then trade it for
don t want amnesty. 68% want to end the visa lottery. 81% want legal immigration curbed. that s big. 79% want merit based. 60% said they didn t want the daca relatives. for the parents of the kids of dreamers, they don t want the dreamer parents to get amnesty. 80% want secure borders. this is a harvard poll. can t argue with that. marie: here is my prediction. you can get a bill out of the senate that protects the dreamers, gives funding for part of the wall, ends chain migration, and the visa diversity lottery system and maybe a few other things. i think you can give it through the senate. the big question will be the house, one of the freedom caucus decides to hold their vote and if they do, i think you can get
he was shot in the stomach when it fired into his car, so far no arrests have been made. donald trump blasting crying chuck schumer overnight after the minority leader withdrew his offer for the border wall in this immigration negotiation but was it even a sincere proposal to begin with when we heard about it last friday? democrats have been all against building the president s wall. we have to start on a new basis and the wall offers off the table. a border wall is a waste of money, squandering billions of dollars on an ineffective solution to border security is reprehensible. we are never, ever going to build your stupid wall.