sole owner of 20th century fox. wasn t one of his children to succeed him, but he doesn t say when, who and how. it s going to have to be fought out between them. two minutes to the official start of the race. there are the boats. the race in australia, it s a big deal. it s a kind of their super bowl. lachlan had done a lot of sailing and he eagerly signed up for the 98 race. 54th race. he sailed onboard the boat sayonara. up on the high side there, getting out. it was a beautiful day. and not long after the race began there was a line of clouds. like a black wall. there were wind gusts of close to 100 miles per hour. and the waves were enormous. is there anything you fear in life? you always worry, i think, about the unexpected that could happen. it could bring all this tumbling down. the boats would head into the waves and they d stort of climb up, and then they d go launching off the top of the wave and hurtling down. certainly one has to remain
negative advertising. i don t believe anyone will ever be elected to a major public office again without the skillful use of television. there was a famous story of ailes the producer of mike douglas show. he invites nixon on. they are in the green room and nixon says it s a hell of a thing that you have to use a gimmick like television to get elected president. the things that senator kennedy has said, many of us can agree with. nixon had contempt for television. ailes you can t have contempt. television is not a gimmick. if you think it is, you are just going to lose again. nicks-says, hire this guy. tonight, the nixon answer. [ applause ] hi, how are you? ailes became nixon s media
here? it doesn t surprise me. you know, don mcgahn is a professional. and his commitment is to the country, not to donald trump. i think it s important for all of us to realize that when we took that oath, and don mcgahn was an assistant to the president just like me, and we all took the same oath. but we took the oath to this country, to the constitution. we did not take an oath to donald trump. let me ask this, in terms of diversity in the white house, i ve been in this, as you know, a long time in civil rights, i can t think of a president, even republican from nixon on, that didn t have a black in the west wing, in at least the discussions, in the senior administrative leadership until now. you were the most public face there. and even there they didn t have they didn t want you in a lot of the meetings that you insisted to be in as i read the book. that s right. he is the first president that has outright excluded.
to guns. allowing greater use of the death penalty. allowing religious people to exempt themselves for from the more and more government requirements. this is the agenda these 25 skwruplgs we judges were picked to advance. as jeff of course will know, they did explicitly say there was room for reasonable gun restrictions. the problem is over the period of the last 40 years you had a center right republican tradition. they were conservative. like kennedy, they weren t necessarily doing mattic. the national unity in the court that the court can reflect depends on swing justicesment a lot of them came from republican presidents from nixon on. that tradition seems to be
is broken forever. there is a transformational moment in american politics, nothing will be the same. it turned out he would be an answer to the trivia question. there was no pre roism. it was a sui general phenomenon. i wonder which paths lay before us. is he this transformational hinge in american history about the appeal of particularly white nationalism front and center or relegated to a kind of footnote? i don t know, i hope it s the latter t. arguments of the former though is, in fact, as much as i say trump is different. he actually is the culmination of a certain path that the republican party chose from nixon on. and particularly chosen how it interacted with obama ever a the last six years, that says he has actual roots in something. this is not a military hunta. this says something about the people that casts the votes. that argues for something more.