streak he has shown or the tendency to take advantage of people in a weaker position. there was nothing. this thing almost book length with an enormous flash on the front page almost all about this one incident disconnected from anything else we know about romney. the point is i think it was much adu about not very much and you have to wonder what is an editor at a newspaper thinking. editors who edit newspapers do in a certain way express editorial opinions by the way they play the story where they play it and at what length. this obviously struck the editors at the washington post and the reporters who work on the story as a big deal. you you have to wonder what kind of news judgment these people have if they really think that. liz citeds romney s failure to respond in her view effectively to that as give giving some strength to the story. that couldn t have entered into what the post reported.
streak he has shown or the tendency to take advantage of people in a weaker position. there was nothing. this thing almost book length with an enormous flash on the front page almost all about this one incident disconnected from anything else we know about romney. the point is i think it was much adu about not very much and you have to wonder what is an editor at a newspaper thinking. editors who edit newspapers do in a certain way express editorial opinions by the way they play the story where they play it and at what length. this obviously struck the editors at the washington post and the reporters who work on the story as a big deal. you you have to wonder what kind of news judgment these people have if they really think that. liz citeds romney s failure to respond in her view effectively to that as give giving some strength to the story. that couldn t have entered into what the post reported.
streak he has shown or the tendency to take advantage of people in a weaker position. there was nothing. this thing almost book length with an enormous flash on the front page almost all about this one incident disconnected from anything else we know about romney. the point is i think it was much adu about not very much and you have to wonder what is an editor at a newspaper thinking. editors who edit newspapers do in a certain way express editorial opinions by the way they play the story where they play it and at what length. this obviously struck the editors at the washington post and the reporters who work on the story as a big deal. you you have to wonder what kind of news judgment these people have if they really think that. liz citeds romney s failure to respond in her view effectively to that as give giving some strength to the story. that couldn t have entered into what the post reported.
in terms of the washington d.c. to new york city access almost completely united on this, it has to happen and occasionally, there s a deviation, occasionally, but you assignment editors, the news judgment, and the komen story to page one and bishop story to page 50 until it s forced by talk radio and others to put it higher. jon: i wish we had a split screen because judy was giving you a look that you disagree? i disagree. i believe that this was essentially, as the president framed it an issue of access to medical care that s essential for women. now, one can argue why they chose, the white house chose this formula, which was perhaps bound to generate controversy, but i think the climb down, the flip-flop, the about face, whatever we wind up calling it was a fair compromise for which he should be given credit because it
cain s alleged sexual assaults, those things seem to pop up on politico and sure enough, you ll see it time after time, show after show on msnbc. any coincidence? yeah, you know, it s almost an institutional bias. their sensitivities, you know, their news judgment lends to those kinds of stories and i think that s very indicative of a liberal bias, maybe not outright but very institutional. now, it spreads beyond msnbc, if i m not mistaken, jonathan martin, they call him mr. betsy fisher, do you know why? right, very incestuous relationship between msnbc and politico. that s evidence there. you could draw your own conclusions from that. would you have run with a story given what we know about politico s sources and what they ve decided to talk about, who their sources are and the extent to which the story was sourced on herman cain. would you have run with that story? no, i thought it was very thinly sourced. now, ultimately, a lot of stuff came out and they could have ran wi