gun owner? how is the public good served? so i think this really is about guns. i know you said earlier. bill: i m a simple sussman you are much smarter than i am i m a simple man. how is the public good served by printing the names and addresses of innocent people who are exercising their rights and they own a legal firearm? how is the public good served by printing that. absolutely i agree. it is really about the public good. bill: how? the scale. which scale is a lot of what we re talking about. bill: you are somehow not understanding me but that s all right. how is the public good served, ms. maxwell? by printing the names of individuals who own guns? bill: yes. i don t think the public good is. bill: so you objected to the journal news. yes it was bad judgment. it wasn t illegal but it was poor judgment. bill: poor judgment poor news judgment is one thing and violating somebody s privacy is quite something else. do you see this as a privacy violation?
you could say that you don t have the right to do it. another part of the law suggests that you do have a right to do it and until this sorts itself out, we are not going to know what the correct interpretation is of that. one last point on this black panther case. fox s bill o reilly making the point that none of the network newscasts have covered this story. he said the network newscasts are not being honored about news because their agenda is to protect pochblgt your thoughts? i think reason there hasn t been much coverage on that is there is a question of how significant this really is. i think it is you know, the coverage or look of coverage has to do with editors news judgment, it doesn t have anything to do with protecting president obama and i mean fox s megan kelly is pump up