Stimulus watch and of course, palantir, we are awaiting the opening trade set to begin really at any moment. Alex karp, the ceo will join us right here on cnbc immediately following the first trade, jon as we said, its been a long road a lot of filings. A lot to read about the company, voting structure, privacy, you name it. And the Business Model at large. Yeah. And its another big, big ipo but very different from snow flake, which we saw which has a ton of customers, large and small and kind of this very broad play on data in the cloud. This is a company thats dealing with big data and has just a few really huge customers, carl. And thats where well start this morning, jon. Josh lipton has more on what to expect once the first trade happens. Hey, josh. Carl, a master of creativity. That is how Ceo Alex Karp describes his company, palantir. A data miner, its software ahows customers to integrate volumes of data into a central platform where it can then be securely analyzed and interpr
We will hear argument first this morning in case 22277, moody versus netchoice. Mr. Whitaker . Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court. Internet platforms today control the way millions of americans communicate with each other and with the world. Platforms achieve that success by marketing themselves as neutral forums for free speech. Now that they host the communications of billions of users, they sing a very different tune. They now say they are in fact editors of their users speech, rather like a newspaper. They contend they possess a broad First Amendment right to censor anything they host on their sites, even when doing so contradict their own representations to consumers. But the design of the First Amendment is to prevent the suppression of speech, not to enable it. That is why the Telephone Company and Delivery Service has no first moment right to use their services as a chokepoint to silence those they disfavor. Broadly facilitating communication in that way is conduct,
We will hear argument first this morning in case 22277, moody versus netchoice. Mr. Whitaker . Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court. Internet platforms today control the way millions of americans communicate with each other and with the world. Platforms achieve that success by marketing themselves as neutral forums for free speech. Now that they host the communications of billions of users, they sing a very different tune. They now say they are in fact editors of their users speech, rather like a newspaper. They contend they possess a broad First Amendment right to censor anything they host on their sites, even when doing so contradict their own representations to consumers. But the design of the First Amendment is to prevent the suppression of speech, not to enable it. That is why the Telephone Company and Delivery Service has no first moment right to use their services as a chokepoint to silence those they disfavor. Broadly facilitating communication in that way is conduct,
Plse the court. Inrnet platforms today control th way millions of americans communicate with each other and with the world. Zhplatforms achieve that success by marketing tas for free speec. Now that they host the communications of billions of ers, they sing a very different tune. Ey now say they are in fact editors of their users speech, ratherike a newspaper. They contend they poesa broad First Amendment right to censor anythinth host on their sites, even when doing so contra theonme. But thdegnf tprent the sureion of speech, not to enable it. That is why the telephone mpy andelivery service has no first moment right tose their services as a chokepoint to silence those they disfavor. Broadly facilitating communication in tt y is conduct, not speech. If verizon asserted a first moment right to cancel disfavoredatou fai social Networking Companies are in the business of transmitting their users speech. Their users are the one who create and select the content that appears on their sites
Internet platforms today control the w millions of americans counate with each other and with the world. Platforms achieve that success by marketing themselves as neutral ru for free spch now that they sthe communications of billions of users, they sing a very differentun they now say they are inact editors of their users speech, rather like a newspaper. They contend they possess a broad first enent right to censor anything they host on their sites, even wn ing so contradict their own representations to consumers. But the design of the First Amendment is to prevent the suppression of speech, not to enable it. Th iwhy the telephone companynd Delivery Service has no first moment right to use their services aa chokepoint sence those they disfavor. Broadly facilitating communication in that way is conduct, not speech. If verizon asserted a first moment right to cancel disfavored clients at a whim, that would fail. Social Networking Companies are in the busesof transmitting their users spee