Funds to fund a supplemental allocation to pay for the increasing cost of doing business for nonprofits and though it didnt pass at the board a fews ago many of our colleagues felt that the funding through this request through a supplemental they felt that it wasnt appropriate at the time. It should go through the regular budget process but they importantly acknowledged also that i think unanimously from my memory that we all want to come up with a comprehensive approach to address the need to adequate compensate to allow nonprofits to stay in the city and stay up with the rising costs and the affordability crisis in the city and this is the beginning of the process and i think we will have a opportunity to dialogue with City Departments how San Francisco can fund the Nonprofit Sector adequately so there is stability and strength in the Nonprofit Sector, strengthening of the Nonprofit Sector and i think the hearing will look at where the money comes from to fund the Nonprofit Sector an
Nonprofit worker for many years and a seiu shop steward as well. From my days 30 years ago with the Chinatown Youth Center and now the youth center and to a receptionist running the california cho ligz of human rights and ran a committee for [inaudible] and most of the work is about supporting the Human Service sector and San Franciscos unique and creative safety net that man of the nonprofit represent. I think with recent studies from the San Francisco foundations recent equity profile of the bay area to the association of bay area governments and the transportation commissions and Economic Prosperity strategy its really critical that the Nonprofit Sector, the safety net of our cities be supported, be a stable and supported as possible. Also i was going to add that supervisors campos and i along with supervisor avalos last year or a few months ago introduced an ordinance that would have appropriated these funds to fund a supplemental allocation to pay for the increasing cost of doing
Good afternoon everybody. Welcome to the San Francisco board of supervisors budget and finance Committee Meeting for wednesday april 22, 2015. I am mark farrell and i will chair this committee and joined by supervisor tang and eric mar and norman yee. I want to thank the clerk of the committee linda wong as well as members of sfgtv covering this meeting. Madam clerk do we have any announcements . Yes mr. Chair. Please silent all cell phones and Electronic Devices and speaker cards and items part the file should be submitted to the clerk and items will be on the april 28 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. Thank you madam clerk. So colleagues today we have two hearings and the first is by supervisor mar and we will ask him to do that. Madam clerk can you call number one. Item 1 is a establishing a permanent annualized nonprofit costofdoing business increase and having the office of the controller to report. Supervisor mar. Thank you mr. Chairman. I made a commitment to
Site. And will there be some way, that, as we transition a household, or our individual firms from the Supportive Housing to the Public Housing, is or will there be the appropriate level of service for that individual or family, for them to be successful . And how do we pay for the transition . Someone living in Supportive Housing has probably no furniture right . And moving into the Public Housing it is not furnished and how do we deal with that to make that happen . I think that the last question, is, as trent said earlier as we move to the question of working on Supportive Housing we really called it permanently supportive and because we always, you know, when the old notion of transitional housing, was well, great, but what do you transition to at the end of two years . Again, in terms of approving the existence system, both increased and decrease td levels of services for our residents, and getting, residents into the right type of housing. You know, again, what we as we are worki
Is, the lack of services when they go to the Public Housing site. And will there be some way, that, as we transition a household, or our individual firms from the Supportive Housing to the Public Housing, is or will there be the appropriate level of service for that individual or family, for them to be successful . And how do we pay for the transition . Someone living in Supportive Housing has probably no furniture right . And moving into the Public Housing it is not furnished and how do we deal with that to make that happen . I think that the last question, is, as trent said earlier as we move to the question of working on Supportive Housing we really called it permanently supportive and because we always, you know, when the old notion of transitional housing, was well, great, but what do you transition to at the end of two years . Again, in terms of approving the existence system, both increased and decrease td levels of services for our residents, and getting, residents into the rig