that don jr. didn t walk these jumos touch his father s office. did president trump meet with any of the people? i have no knowledge of anything to do with that meeting. okay. but what i can tell you unequivocally is that the allegations and insinuations in this book, which are a pure work of fiction are nothing but a pile of trash through and through. to your comment, he was also the president s chief strategist. so one of the other tragedies of this grotesque work of fiction is its portrayal of the president. the reality is that the president is a political genius who won against a field of 17 incredibly talented people. who took down the bush dynasty, who took down the clinton dynasty, who took down the entire media complex with its 90% negative coverage. took down billions of dollars in special interests donations. and he did it all through the people and through his strategy and his vision and his insight
and with respect to the trump tower meeting that he is talking about, he wasn t even there when this want down. so he is not really a remotely credible source on any of it. it reads like an angry, vindictive person spouting off to a highly discredible author. the book is book is best understood as a poorly work of fiction. and i will also say the author is a garbage author of a gorge book. and miller wasn t done. he defended the president against the book s claim that mr. trump is not fit for office. take a listen. the reality is the president is a political genius who won against a field of 17 incredibly talented people, who took down the bush dynasty, who took down the clinton dynasty, who took down the entire media complex with its 90% negative coverage. took down billions of dollars in special interest donations. and he did it all through the people and through his strategy
positive coverage which is fascinating when you look at the five big indicators that he was voted in on. economy doing well. jobs doing well. isis decimated. immigration has some work to do, health care didn t work out. can t possibly come to 5%. when you compare that to the previous president he only received 20% negative coverage. trump 5% positive coverage, obama 20% negative. the economy the numbers are fine. that s great. i want to see reporters get out of new york and washington where they re doing all of this pontificating and talk to people in ohio, michigan, pennsylvania, wisconsin, and i want to see if the economic effects are real because that s where he got involved voted devon, it s lazy and doesn t fit the narrative.
president trump receives 5% positive coverage which is fascinating when you look at the five big indicators that he was voted in on. economy doing well. jobs doing well. isis decimated. immigration has some work to do, health care didn t work out. can t possibly come to 5%. when you compare that to the previous president he only received 20% negative coverage. trump 5% positive coverage, obama 20% negative. the economy the numbers are fine. that s great. i want to see reporters get out of new york and washington where they re doing all of this pontificating and talk to people in ohio, michigan, pennsylvania, wisconsin, and i want to see if the economic effects are real because that s where he got involved voted devon, it s lazy and doesn t fit the narrative.
president barack obama who got only 20% negative coverage. this is why political consultant harlan hill says the president just needs to keep tweeting away. katie fratus says the president needs to tone it down. harlan, you know, you look at stats like that, like we just showed you from the pugh research center, and it s clear the media doesn t like the guy. they really don t. we could point to numerous stories and headlines and pictures, et cetera, that prove that. if you re him, isn t this a way for you to fire back? you don t have to go through a reporter. you can say it directly yourself. yeah. unfiltered. trish: so you say he should keep doing that? absolutely, i m numbers driven. you know, he was wildly outspent in 2016. the tool, the differentiator that he had that clinton did not have was this incredibly engaged