Mr. Mccain none of the moderate of forces have come under attack from russia . Secretary carter not in our title x program. Mr. Mccain that is fascinating. Secretary carter let me be clear, chairman, the russians attackde assad do moderate forces. One of the reasons why the russian approach is so mr. Mccain are we going to train these young people . Of a going to send them into syria to fight . Are going to protect them . Anyone we send in an train, we are going to protect from russian air attacks. Secretary carter we have an obligation to do that and we have made that clear right from the beginning. Mr. Mccain we havent done it. We havent done it. I promise you the have. You will have to correct the record. And formerronius secretary kade, and now we understand secretary clinton, have all stated that they think we should stop the barrel bombing and that we should train and equip. Zones should have nofly or aircraft exclusionary zones. As complicated as it is, we were able to do northe
To bel not allow them partners with iraq in that regard. We are the preferred partners of iraq. The Prime Minister has repeated those pledges. I only say that because we feel emphatically about receiving those pledges. We intend to have been implemented by private history body. Prime minister of i raise it both with the mr. And france and private mr. And Prime Minister. Nots assured that they had extended that invitation. They dont intend to extend an invitation to do that. Our request renew that they exclude russian aircraft from the airspace. Our military should be prepared to help with that. Thank you. You. Or mccain thank my question is, what is their in game . Theree been bogged down sometime. When i go to West Virginia and talk to citizens, fax you have to have people feel like theyre safe. As the country rebuilds, there are still people there that are basically peaceloving, well educated. We have not made a decision on that. I know that the chairman has asked about that. Involve
This is the most exposed economy. The slowdown, as we know, is all currency. Guy a proxy on the dollar taking a hammering of late. Helping out the gdp story slowdown, this is happening another story. You wonder what it would be like. But the aussie dollar versus the u. S. Dollar. We hit that down here, a fairly significant moment there. We popped up above the line now. But nevertheless, weakness continuing to be the scene. Running through the currency, i want to show you what happened. You talked about the late turnaround in shanghai yesterday. Stocks around the world got absolutely hammered. Today, we are bouncing back. Positive a much more session, this is the dow jones and the s p 500. They will open up a little bit stronger on the dow average, 1. 4 . We will understand the european session in a bit. The what is historically worst month of the year for trading. September is the worst month. And we saw those markets down more than 2 nearly 3 at some stages. Technology, oil, banks all
Enforcement actions and the lessons that we should take away from them. We must recognize that Enforcement Actions are just one part of the answer, so im interested in hearing also about how we can better inform computer users of the dangers of botnets and what other hygiene steps we can take to address this threat. My hope is that this hearing starts a conversation among those dealing day to day with the botnet threat and those of us in congress who are deeply concerned about that threat. Congress, of course, cannot and should not dictate tactics for fighting botnets. That must be driven by the expertise of those on the front lines of the fight, but congress does have an Important Role to make sure there is a solid Legal Foundation for Enforcement Actions against botnets and clear standards governing when they can occur. We must also ensure that botnet takedowns and other actions are carried out in a way that protects consumers privacy. All while recognizing that botnets themselves re
The professor believes that he could bring suit if he thought the speaker of the house assumed the roll of commander in chief. The point here is not who was the better reading on this particular question of whether theres an implicit Transition Authority to smooth the transition to the new requirements. The critical fact that this is mere lay debate about the best way of construing legislation and the house has no legal interest in that. Now, whatever the right answer. This may be an important matter in terms of extending health care to 25, or 30 million americans and making sure the business has time to comply with the new requirements that this business desired and as i believe this house overwhelmingly supports. Thats what this transition is carrying out. Whatever the right answer to that question, i think its safe to say that never in our history has such a radical change in the role of the Judicial Branch been proposed to deal with such a routine question of administrative process