The professor believes that he could bring suit if he thought the speaker of the house assumed the roll of commander in chief. The point here is not who was the better reading on this particular question of whether theres an implicit Transition Authority to smooth the transition to the new requirements. The critical fact that this is mere lay debate about the best way of construing legislation and the house has no legal interest in that. Now, whatever the right answer. This may be an important matter in terms of extending health care to 25, or 30 million americans and making sure the business has time to comply with the new requirements that this business desired and as i believe this house overwhelmingly supports. Thats what this transition is carrying out. Whatever the right answer to that question, i think its safe to say that never in our history has such a radical change in the role of the Judicial Branch been proposed to deal with such a routine question of administrative process
Rate of improving Unemployment Rate and what that says about our economy. Youve talked about that both in your policy report and your written statement here today and your oral statement you said the Unemployment Rate has fallen nearly 1. 5 rates over the past year. It stood at 6. 1 . The gentleman will suspend. The clerk is having a little trouble hearing if you could speak closer to the microphone. Much has been said about the Unemployment Rate fallen 4 points from the height. My concern is that these government numbers dont seem to distinguish between full time employment and part time employment. If the gentleman would suspend one more time. Would you mind using the microphone adjacent to you and lets see if that corrects the problem . Is that better . Perhaps the microphone for mr. West mooreland might work. Lets try this . Okay. Chairman in march you gave a speech about what the fed is doing to tackle the Unemployment Rate. You made this observation. This is a quote, the existenc