Shh. Good morning. Welcome to a. C. S. s annual Supreme Court preview. Im kara stein, Vice President of policy and program at a. C. S. Which most of you likely know is a National Network of lawyers, law students, judges and policymakers who believe that a law should be a force to improve peoples lives. So here we are again. After a Supreme Court term that many felt was lackluster, despite the muchdelayed addition to the ninth justice to the bench, we are looking at an upcoming term that promises the high stakes we had grown accustomed to in recent years. You need only look at the first two weeks of oral arguments to see what i mean. During just those five days, the court will continue the constitutionality of the president s travel ban, legitimacy of wisconsins redistricting scheme and whether American Workers can be forced to arbitrate their disputes with their employers as opposed to have a day in court. Some might say the stakes are perhaps too high. To lead us through the discussio
Kara good morning, everyone. Shh. Good morning. Welcome to a. C. S. s annual Supreme Court preview. Im kara stein, Vice President of policy and program at a. C. S. Which most of you likely know is a National Network of lawyers, law students, judges and policymakers who believe that a law should be a force to improve peoples lives. So here we are again. After a Supreme Court term that many felt was lackluster, despite the muchdelayed addition to the ninth justice to the bench, we are looking at an upcoming term that promises the high stakes we had grown accustomed to in recent years. You need only look at the first two weeks of oral arguments to see what i mean. During just those five days, the court will continue the constitutionality of the president s travel ban, legitimacy of wisconsins redistricting scheme and whether American Workers can be forced to arbitrate their disputes with their employers as opposed to have a day in court. Some might say the stakes are perhaps too high. To
Welcome to the annual Supreme Court preview. Im karis, Vice President of policy and programs at acs. Most of you likely know this is a National Network of lawyers, law students, judges and policymakers who believe that the law should be enforced to improve peoples lives. Here we are again. After a Supreme Court term that many felt was lackluster despite the delayed addition of the knife justice to the bench, we are looking at an upcoming term that promises the highstakes that we had grown accustomed to in recent years. You need only look at the first two weeks of oral arguments to see what i mean. During the first five days the court will consider the constitutionality of the president s troubled man, legitimacy of wisconsins redistricting scheme and whether American Workers can be forced to arbitrate their disputes with their employers as opposed to having a day in court. Some might say the stakes are too high and to lead us through the discussion today is a distinguished panel. We we
Welcome to the annual Supreme Court preview. Im karis, Vice President of policy and programs at acs. Most of you likely know this is a National Network of lawyers, law students, judges and policymakers who believe that the law should be enforced to improve peoples lives. Here we are again. After a Supreme Court term that many felt was lackluster despite the delayed addition of the knife justice to the bench, we are looking at an upcoming term that promises the highstakes that we had grown accustomed to in recent years. You need only look at the first two weeks of oral arguments to see what i mean. During the first five days the court will consider the constitutionality of the president s troubled man, legitimacy of wisconsins redistricting scheme and whether American Workers can be forced to arbitrate their disputes with their employers as opposed to having a day in court. Some might say the stakes are too high and to lead us through the discussion today is a distinguished panel. We we
Bargaining or other mutual aid or protection. This argument is just over one hour. This courts cases revive provide a well trodden path for resolving such claims. Yield in theonly face of a contrary congressional command and the tie goes to arbitration. Applying those principles to section seven, the result is clear that the faa should not yield. Is that a concession that this is a concerted action . I do not know that it is a concession framework,opted that should we assume this is a concerted action . The faa prevailed. I think what you would say, justice kennedy, is the activity protected by section seven gets them to the threshold of the courthouse. Section seven is directed to the workplace, not the courthouse. It protects their right to decide they want to initiate action. The courthouse is not at issue here as i understand it. These employees say we do not object to arbitration, what we oneonone, is the the employee against the employer. The driving force of the nra was the reco