Bargaining or other mutual aid or protection. This argument is just over one hour. This courts cases revive provide a well trodden path for resolving such claims. Yield in theonly face of a contrary congressional command and the tie goes to arbitration. Applying those principles to section seven, the result is clear that the faa should not yield. Is that a concession that this is a concerted action . I do not know that it is a concession framework,opted that should we assume this is a concerted action . The faa prevailed. I think what you would say, justice kennedy, is the activity protected by section seven gets them to the threshold of the courthouse. Section seven is directed to the workplace, not the courthouse. It protects their right to decide they want to initiate action. The courthouse is not at issue here as i understand it. These employees say we do not object to arbitration, what we oneonone, is the the employee against the employer. The driving force of the nra was the reco
Can prevent employees from joining together to file classaction muskets against the company. The court will decide if such contracts violate section seven of the National Labor relations act. This oral argument is just over one hour. This courts cases provide a well tried path for resolving such claims. Because of the clarity that faa lamotte yield in the face of a contrary congressional demand and the tie goes to arbitration. Applying this principle to section seven, the result is clear that the faa should not yield. Is that a concession that this is a concerted action . I dont know that it is a concession. That premiseted for the opinion of the court. I think he would say the concerted activity protected by section seven at most gets them to the threshold of the courthouse. But section seven is directed to. He workplace it protects the right to name a place to decide if they want to initiate action. That is not an issue here as i understand it. Dont object to arbitration, but what we
Enforcible under the faa are otherwise invalid of another federal statute. This court case has provided a well introduce case for solving such claims, because of enforcing arbitration agreements as written the faa will only yield nains of a congressional demand and the tie goes to arbitration. Applying those principles, the result is clear the faa should not yield. Is that a concession this is a concerted action . I dont know that it is a concession. If we adopted that premise for the opinion of the court, wouldnt we have to say we assume this is concerted action under the nlra section 7 but the faa prevails . I think what you would say, Justice Kennedy, the concerted activity protected by section 7 at most gets them to the threshold of the courthouse. Section 7 is directed to the workplace not the courthouse and they decide they want to initiate action. Mr. Clement, the courthouse is not at issue here, as i understand it. These employees say we dont object to arbitration but we do obj
Enforcible under the faa are otherwise invalid of another federal statute. This court case has provided a well introduce case for solving such claims, because of enforcing arbitration agreements as written the faa will only yield nains of a congressional demand and the tie goes to arbitration. Applying those principles, the result is clear the faa should not yield. Is that a concession this is a concerted action . I dont know that it is a concession. If we adopted that premise for the opinion of the court, wouldnt we have to say we assume this is concerted action under the nlra section 7 but the faa prevails . I think what you would say, Justice Kennedy, the concerted activity protected by section 7 at most gets them to the threshold of the courthouse. Section 7 is directed to the workplace not the courthouse and they decide they want to initiate action. Mr. Clement, the courthouse is not at issue here, as i understand it. These employees say we dont object to arbitration but we do obj
Thanks for watching us. Im rosemary church. Im john vause. The Obama Administration is defending the weekend Prisoner Exchange that freed a u. S. Soldier. And the spiritual leader of the Afghan Taliban is praising that controversial deal, calling the swap a great victory for having secured the release from Guantanamo Bay of what he says were five important members of the taliban. Needless to say, the deal that freed Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl is opening quite a debate. The details now from joe johns. A good day. Reporter a day after the president s emotional celebration with Bowe Bergdahls parents in the rose garden, tough questions for his National Security adviser, susan rice on, cnns state of the union with candy crowley. Did the United States negotiate with terrorists for his release . What we did was ensure that the United States doesnt leave a man or woman on the battlefield. Reporter rice said bergdahls Failing Health justified not telling 30 days beforehand as the law requires