From seca. It should be noted that the project was evaluated in 2005 after the removal of the materials except for the montgomery street and had received a certificate of approval. The project was received an exemption at that time. The current proposal is a slight modification. Includes the stucco and as well as adding a much smaller roof deck area and penthouses on the roof. The current proposal is an attempt by the new owners of the building to finish construction that was started by the previous owner, and it will not remove additional historic fabric from the building. This will replace the historic fabric that was previously removed with the compatible replacement material to bring back the building and still convey the building as a resource. As such the department has found that the proposed work meets the standards and the requirement of article ten and therefore, it is exempt from the secua. The project sponsor is here to scribe the project for me and the details of the skop
Facade and pattern for the side and the proportion and based again on the photographic evidence and that the north and south side elevations will be appropriate on the secondary elevations of the building and will be painted to match the finish as conditioned. Based on these findings, the Department Recommends the approval with the following conditions of approval, revised drawings should be included as part of the building submital and including the attachment details for the rail on the roof and revised drawings shall be included as part of the Building Permit submital and including the windows that closely match the configuration and all exterior profiles of the buildings based on the historic photographic evidence. And after issuance of the Building Permit and prior to installation, a mockup of the metal and the materials and integral cover or finish shall be reviewed and approved by the department preservation staff and more of a stucco finish shall be reviewed at the project site
Be included as part of the Building Permit submital and including the windows that closely match the configuration and all exterior profiles of the buildings based on the historic photographic evidence. And after issuance of the Building Permit and prior to installation, a mockup of the metal and the materials and integral cover or finish shall be reviewed and approved by the department preservation staff and more of a stucco finish shall be reviewed at the project site and on proved by the Department Staff and the panels along the north and the south sides shall be painted to match the color of the stucco. The color and panels should match or pick on the colors and on the colors found in the Jackson Square landmark district. The project site was posted with the hearing notices and the notices were sent out with the requirements of the planning code and the department has received five letters and 103 signed copies of the form letter in support of the project. And the department has al
Directors announcements. Good afternoon, commissioners, tim, the Department Staff and directors announcements are included in his report in your packet and i am happy to answer any questions if you have them. Any questions . Seeing none . Item two, review of passed weeks of the Planning Commission and the staff report and announcements. Good afternoon, commissioners, tim, Department Staff, a couple of items to share with you, in correspondence whether there is a memo from mary brown of our staff outlining directions on how to access the sunset survey Historic Resource findings. As many of you recall we moved to an all electronic. We have made a full departure from the hard copies and everything is located online and so you will no longer be receiving printouts for the forms or the cd with the material. All of the material is located in the google map on the website, if you have questions about how to access that information please give me or mary brown a call and we are happy to walk y
The reduced size of the roof deck and the substantial set back provided from the edges of the building, the new roof top additions appear to be minimally visible and will not result on the additional impact on the roof. Based on the reveal of the proposed drawings and the specifickations it plans to meet it for the article plan for the following reasons and that the use of stucco finish is appropriate given that the building was finished in stucco prior to 1958 as documented in for by the photographic evidence and as evidenced in the analysis of the bricks as well as the existence of other structures and stucco finish for the immediate vicinity of the building and that the new windows will match and reference the windows along the facade and pattern for the side and the proportion and based again on the photographic evidence and that the north and south side elevations will be appropriate on the secondary elevations of the building and will be painted to match the finish as conditioned