it s such an impossible question to answer what do you say to the lawyer, hush money happens all the time. there s hundreds of them thank you, my friend, as always and thanks for joining us this hour the battle to be the standard bearer for the american far right has officially begun ron desanctus, everybody ever heard of him. he was bad against ethanol and he also fought against social security. he wanted to decimate it he wanted the minimum retirement age to be lifted to people 70 years old. he also voted to severely cut medicare i will not be cutting medicare and i ll not be cutting social security ron was a disciple of paul ryan, who was a rino loser who currently is destroying fox and constantly vote against entitlements ron reminds me a lot of mitt rumny. reminds me a lot of mitt romney which is the most epic burn you can levy in today s gop. he of course is not stopping there. trump had some unique things to say about his potential rival and vice president mi
charged in the death of tyre nichols. the 29-year-old was killed more than two weeks ago after an encounter with the memphis police. the court records show that the ex-officers have been charged with second-degree murder, aggravated assault and kidnapped. they were fired less than a week ago after an internal investigation. the courthouse says that they will be charged with criminal charges. a warning that the images that you will see is disturbing. this is how nichols looked before his encounter with police, and then he was pulled over, and the nichols family said they saw the beating of their son, and they described it as savage. don lemon is in memphis, and don, what are the sources telling you about the release of the video? well, they are telling us that it is going to be tomorrow, and that is the plan as of now, victor, they will release it sometime tomorrow, and they are still coordinating and still meeting, and this is the plan as of now, and they believe that the v
more fall in the wake of the brutal beating by memphis police officers. like today, the city firebombed not-so-termination of three personnel. , tully, empties and lieutenant who drove them to the scene. also tonight, the police department revealed that a six, that a seventh officer had been, quote, relieved duty. as you know, i bet already been fired and charged with second degree murder. their specialized scorpion unit is now disbanded, and there could be more charges, and administrative changes to come. we talk about that snow to the local district attorney, also, our legal team on the potential difficulty of getting convictions center tennessee s murder statute. a lot enforcement experts weigh in on the effects, or lack of won the officers body cameras had on their behavior. including one suspended officer who came on the scene shortly after miracles a loafer. this is part of his cameras recording, warning, this is graphic both in terms of what you see in what you hear. i
To have said all i need you to do is to find me 11,000 votes unchanged. I think if you look at that context it is pretty clear that petitioner is acting in the capacity of office seeker, not as president i am focus on the legal test. I am not hearing any objections to it. Other than i think the d. C. Circuit place more Content Consideration off limit then i went. I want to understand on the court immunity, or whatever word we use, it seems to me that we are narrowing the ground of dispute here considerably. Do we look at motives . The president s motives for his actions . For example, he has lots of power as weve discussed, but he might use them to enhance his election in his personal interest. It is not a relevant consideration when we look at core powers . I think of this more as looking at the objectives of the activity as opposed to the subjective motives in the sense that you are i think there is concern about seeing a electoral motive to be reelected as such. Every firstterm pres
Content, its clear that petitioner is acting in the capacity as office seeker, not as president. We would look at that content. Okay. The test im focused on the legal test. Im not hearing any objections to it. Other than, i think that the d. C. Circuit placed more Content Consideration off limits than i would. All right. I wanted to understand, on the Core Immunity or whatever word we use, that it seems to me we are narrowing the ground of dispute here considerably, do we look at motives, the president s motives for his actions . For example, he has more power as we discussed, but he might use them to enhance his election, his personal interests. Is that a relevant consideration when were looking at core powers . I am thinking of this more as looking at the objective of the activity as opposed to the subjective motive in the sense that your honor is talking about. I think theres a lot of concern about saying an electoral motive to be reelected. Right. Every firstterm president everythi