Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 932 To 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 1025Nominal Index Indrakunwar v. State of Chattisgarh 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 932Manish Sisodia v. Central Bureau of Investigation 2023 LiveLaw (SC).
Supreme Court Supreme Court Affirms Penalty On Zarda Manufacturers For Misclassifying Product As Chewing Tobacco For Central Excise Duty Case Title: Commr. Of Cen. Exc. Ahmedabad v M/S.
In the respective case, the travel agent had promised delivery within a week by air whereas by sea it would have taken 25 to 30 days. However, the goods were delivered by the airline after 45 days. Therefore the Supreme Court found nothing wrong with an earlier consumer court order to compensate the consumer, as an agent has the inherent power to promise on behalf of the principal, observes Chartered Accountant and Columnist S Muralidharan.
Supreme Court UP VAT Act | Assessee Entitled To Claim Full Input Tax Credit On Exempted Goods Produced As By-Products Or Waste Products During Manufacturing Of Taxable Goods: Supreme Court .
The Supreme Court has held that the definition of “Goods” under Section 2(m) of Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 (“UP VAT Act”) includes both taxable as well as exempted goods. Similarly, the.